Surgeons in Scotland debate the helmet issue – do they increase cyclists’ safety or not?

[B’ Spokes: Note that our helmet bill is still in committee with no vote yet.]
*******************************************************************************
By Simon_MacMichael, Road.cc
Neurosurgeon argues for wearing them… trauma specialist (who chairs CTC Scotland) opposes compulsion

Instead, after outlining other things that can be done to improve cycle safety such as addressing traffic speed and improving road layout, she says: “Most of the head injuries I have seen in cyclists are the result of low velocity crashes or simple falls due to ice or wet roads.
“There is no doubt in my mind that a well-fitting cycle helmet will reduce the incidence of scalp laceration and open fracture and will help to reduce the energy transfer to the brain.”
Apart from in sports, where she believes the type of potential injuries justifies governing bodies making helmets mandatory, Ms Myles isn’t calling for helmets to be made compulsory; she does point out though, that “in my department all neurosurgeons, neurologists neurointensivists and neuroanaesthetists wear cycling helmets when cycling – we can’t all be mad!”
Mr Oliver, however, maintains that “there is no justification for helmet laws or promotional campaigns that portray cycling as a particularly ‘dangerous’ activity, or that make unfounded claims about the effectiveness of helmets.
“By reducing cycle use even slightly, helmet laws or promotion campaigns are likely to cause a significant net disbenefit to public health, regardless of the effectiveness or otherwise of helmets,” he adds.

https://road.cc/content/news/77035-surgeons-scotland-debate-helmet-issue-do-they-increase-cyclists-safety-or-not

Leave a Reply