Study purports to equate NASCAR viewing with aggressive driving

[B’ Spokes: No doubt one of my pet peeves is people who call cyclists Lance Armstrong wannabees, like Ooo that’s a really bad character trait trying to better oneself. But more to the point is being a [NASCAR driver name] wannabee a better thing? The following article hints that no it is not.

We used to define "being into sports" as the physical activity we enjoyed doing but now our culture seems to define "being into sports" as "pass me a beer and the TV remote" as if anything short of pro level is detestable. This is in part why we have an obesity epidemic. We need to flip the current conversations so Lance Armstrong wannabees is a good thing and [NASCAR driver name] wannabees is a bad thing, a very bad thing.]
*********************************************************************************************************
AOL Sporting News


The research found the number of aggressive-driving accidents declined on race days and hypothesized that might be attributable to race fans staying home to watch on TV. Five days after a NASCAR race, however, the number of aggressive-driving accidents and injuries spiked significantly.

https://aol.sportingnews.com/nascar/story/2011-07-30/study-purports-to-equate-nascar-viewing-with-aggressive-driving

Is Urbanism Slowing the Rise of Car Travel?

by ERIC JAFFE, The Atlantic Cities
Early last week the State Smart Transportation Initiative, a sustainable transport program funded by the Department of Transportation, released some charts on the continued decline of vehicle-miles traveled in the United States. Overall VMT dropped 1.2 percent in 2011 from the previous year, reaching its lowest total since 2003, and per capita VMT fell 2.1 percent to levels not seen since 1998:

The 64-mile-per-gallon question is why. The simplified and convenient answer is often gas prices, and with today’s New York Times reporting the "spector" of $5 a gallon fuel prices it may become a favored political one this election year. But an equally compelling reason is a rise in the embrace of sustainable land-use patterns. A brief analysis by SSTI found a weak connection between VMT and gas prices, and a rather strong one between vehicle miles and urban density:

https://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/03/urbanism-slowing-rise-car-travel/1372/

Nope, more drilling won’t bring back $2.50 gasoline

[B’ Spokes: I’ll note this is bike related as far as it is part of the conversations of the House Transportation Bill that has nixed bike/ped funding. This is also a more factual response then my Brew Baby, Brew! article https://www.baltimorespokes.org/article.php?story=20120301142515382 ]
*****************************************************************************************************************************
by Brad Plumer, Washington Post
On the campaign trail, Newt Gingrich keeps insisting that if America drilled for more oil, we could return to the days of $2.50-per-gallon gasoline. Michael Conathan says this is dubious, noting that drilling has been booming since 2009, yet gas prices keep rising:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/why-more-drilling-wont-lower-gas-prices/2012/03/01/gIQALNBtkR_blog.html?wprss=linkset

Put a lock on transportation funds or put a lock on general funds?

B’ Spokes: I would like to point out many of the fees that go into the transportation trust fund are tax free so support for ancillary services such as police, fire and other first responders services for motorists that are paid from the general fund are not paid for by motorists even though servicing the state’s annual average of 97,023 auto crashes takes up a heck of a lot of resources paid for by the general fund.

Over simplified, part of the problem is when the state puts the wrong emphasis on just building fast roads for cars the increase in crashes causes an increase spending from the general fund. And the reverse is also true, put the emphasis on safe streets for all users and smooth travel for cars and there is less demand from the general fund for ancillary services of our roads.

So in short the true cost of our roads cannot be defined by pennies on a gallon of gas and a small fee per driver and per motorized vehicle. This is the problem and not the small sloshing back and forth of funds to and fro from the general fund and the transportation trust fund.

I will also not that:

While congestion is an important issue facing the nation, an equally, if not more important issue facing the country and states is how to pay for transportation infrastructure improvements. Most transportation funding at the State and federal level is derived from the gas tax. However, State and federal gas taxes have not been increased since the early 1990s. As a result, the purchasing power of transportation revenues has declined as the price of construction materials has grown dramatically.

Transportation financing in Maryland was partially addressed during the 2007 special session. A portion of the sales tax was dedicated to transportation,….
https://dlslibrary.state.md.us/publications/OPA/I/Bumper_Analysis.pdf

So we essentially have it’s OK to steal from the general fund but some are offended when it goes the other way??? Really, what’s more important, education or more roads?

So now let’s get into the article that I am reacting to https://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?StoryID=131915

Maryland Sen. David Brinkley is seeking to amend the state constitution in an effort to protect the transportation trust fund, a pot of money fueled by gas and car titling taxes, as well as fees and other revenue sources. In past years, the state has siphoned dollars from the fund to bolster the general fund, a practice Brinkley said needs to stop.

“The integrity has to be restored to the transportation ‘mistrust’ fund,” the Republican lawmaker said in an interview. “You can’t go harvesting dedicated funds to balance the budget.”

I would like to ask just how many dedicated funds do we have anyway? Just one? And why does that one rate to be a dedicated fund anyway?

Let’s make back to school supplies sales tax exempt but charge a small fee to go to a dedicated educational fund, let’s make shoes tax exempt and make a small charge to go into a sidewalk fund. Let’s do this for anything and everything that’s important, dedicated funds for all! OK that’s silly but no more silly then trying to keep a source of revenue that is already raiding the general fund from putting some of it back.

But Brinkley said this is not the time to talk about raising fuel costs.

Sorry this is exactly the time to talk about this: economic conditions since 2008 have partly
contributed to recent decreases or no change in VMT.

The “need” for more highways is not what it once was. Just because we still have projects on the books from the time when Maryland’s VMT has outpaced population does not mean they are still a valid “need.”

We really need to end this car first mentality! Keep what we have in good repair and what money is left over use for improvements. We can do this now with no increase in taxes. The problems come in when we stress “improvements” over and above all other things, we can do some improvements but how many is enough? Well if what we can afford isn’t good enough then get sales tax out of the highway trust fund NOW! And raise taxes on those who want more road improvements. Oh ya, and let’s start charging the trust fund for ancillary services while we are at, after all a dedicated fund for all things motoring should pay for all things motoring right?

Cycle Maryland survey results shared at Bike Maryland forum

About 75 percent of the 2,300 Maryland bicyclists who responded to the online Cycle Maryland survey last year said they use paper maps and those who use the Maryland Bicycle Map find it useful. At the same time, 85 percent said they use online maps and 80 percent print those maps. The bicyclists also said getting outdoors, enjoying nature and traveling to restaurants, shopping and tourist attractions were their most popular biking activities.
Those were some of the findings that Rebecca Dougherty Goldman, research and performance metrics manager at the Maryland Office of Tourism, shared during her presentation at the 15th annual Maryland Bike Symposium, Feb. 22 at the Miller Senate Building in Annapolis.
The tourism office conducted the survey with the State Highway Administration primarily to evaluate the existing state bicycle map during Gov. Martin O’Malley’s Cycle Maryland campaign – a six-month period that highlighted bicycle events and an awareness of biking in Maryland.
Bike Maryland – a nonprofit advocacy group – hosted the free, all-day symposium, which this year featured 15 expert presenters. Topics of discussion included: Bike Maryland’s legislative agenda, Maryland Bikeshare Program, Bike Friendly Maryland Program, Bike-Minded Program, bicycle tourism and the new Maryland Bikeways Program.
https://visitmaryland.org/Newsletter/Insights/02.22.12/index.html