Buzz Kill

from Road Rights By Bob Mionske
One of the most egregious violations of our right to the road is the “buzz,” when a motorist passes a cyclist perilously close—so close that buzzes frequently become rear-end collisions.
Some motorists are simply so inattentive while driving that they don’t even know that they are passing a cyclist. Other motorists don’t understand what a safe passing distance is.
But many drivers who buzz cyclists know exactly what they are doing. Vigilante motorists who disagree with the laws that give cyclists the right to the road attempt to force us from that road, by using their vehicles to intimidate their victims.
Every state requires that overtaking vehicles must pass at a safe distance. If the overtaking vehicle cannot, the law requires the driver to wait until the pass can be safely executed. Thus, buzzing a cyclist is against the law in every state. It is never legal, under any circumstances.
Despite the law, drivers who buzz cyclists are rarely ticketed, because buzzes rarely occur in the presence of police. But even if the police do observe a violation, it can still be difficult to get a conviction. The law requires passes to be made at a “safe distance,” but what does that mean, exactly? A driver who is accused of making a pass at an unsafe distance can argue that the passing distance was safe for existing conditions—even if the pass resulted in a collision. It’s then up to the judge or jury to decide what is safe.

Read more: https://bicycling.com/blogs/roadrights/2011/12/22/buzz-kill/

A Traffic Engineer’s Lament

by alima
Traffic engineers are being marginalized and viewed as anachronisms, like Mad Men from a bygone age. As Christopher B. Leinberger, senior fellow at The Brookings Institution and professor of planning at the University of Michigan, writes in a recent NY Times op-ed, “traffic engineers dismissively call [bus and light-rail systems, bike lanes and pedestrian improvements] ‘alternative transportation.’”
In saying so, he, and planners around the world, are being dismissive of me and my profession. We are the GEICO Neanderthals of society.
And who’s to blame? Yes, we deserve a lot of it. We, as a profession, continued to build more roads, wider roads, and faster roads while knowing full well we were running out of capacity and making transport systems less efficient.
An example I’ve used time and time again in New York City is that the Brooklyn Bridge, when it was largely a rail and walking bridge, handled 430,000 people daily. In the 1940’s, we ‘modernized’ it by removing the rail; its daily person carrying volume dropped to 180,000.

Continue reading “A Traffic Engineer’s Lament”

Jan 10, 11 Connecting Columbia Open House Meetings

As an active member of the Columbia community, we thought you’d be interested in attending CA’s upcoming Connecting Columbia opening house meetings on January 10 and 11.  The goal of Connecting Columbia is to create an active transportation action agenda that will result in a more interconnected bicycling and walking circulation system for health, recreation and transportation purposes. We hope you will attend and help us spread the word about the meetings, which will be held on Tuesday, January 10, at the Owen Brown Community Center, located at 6800 Cradlerock Way; and Wednesday, January 11, at Slayton House, located at 10400 Cross Fox Lane. Both meetings will be held from 7:30 to 9 p.m. and will feature the same content with a presentation at 8:00p.m. Although registration is not required, it is very much appreciated.

Please view CA’s press release and event flyer. If you have questions regarding the meetings, please contact Scott Templin at scott.templin@columbiaassociation.com or 410-715-3166. For more information on the project, visit ColumbiaAssociation.org/ConnectingColumbia. Thank you and enjoy the holidays.

Jane L. Dembner, AICP
Director of Community Planning
Phone: 410-715-3107
Email: Jane.Dembner@ColumbiaAssociation.com

What, no outcry for faster vehicle speeds and more parking for increased commerce?

John Allen shares a bike ride through a street where pedestrian traffic has taken over. It amazes me how many businesses do not want anything like this where they are located. We seriously need to rethink what public space (also know as streets) is for and as much as there is a stress for expressways and fast travel there needs to be a similar stress to create locations with similar characteristics as shown. There is room for both, it does not have to be one way or the other.

Health officials once again downplay the benefit of exercise and bicycling

Disclaimer: I am not in the medical profession but my comments are based on my observations from helping people get back on the bike the first time since childhood.

The following is a reaction to Translating Calorie Counts into Exercise Equivalents Leads to Healthier Choices in Scientific American.


So how long does it take to burn 250 calories by bike, 73 minutes or 17 minutes? Which is it?

Let’s face it, if you could do a high intensity “burn” of calories you would be out their running and not reading this blog. But here you are thinking about riding a bike… I hate to break it to you but when you first start out all you can really do intensity wise is what you have been “training” for up to this point, which is probably just walking level of excretion, which would probably take over two hours to burn off 250 calories. But on the other extreme a fit cyclist could probably burn that off in 17 minutes (more on how I got that number in the Read More.) The problem of course how do you get form where you are to the other end?

This is where the power of the bicycle comes in

Distance: Do to the mechanical advantage of the bicycle you can go two to four times the distance with the same excretion as just using your legs alone. This makes for an opportunity to integrate bicycling into your daily routine by using it for transportation for trips 5 miles or less (for starters.) Doing shopping trips or biking to work are amazing ways to work in some exercise into a hectic schedule as just the time difference between biking and driving is the “negative” and the more you bike the smaller that difference gets. So basically for 15 minutes extra you can get in a good half hour of exercise. (Your experience may vary.)

Speed: Let’s face it going fast is fun, going fast under your own power is even more fun. The people I have observed who successively used bicycling to control their weight have tapped into this aspect, whether consciously or not. I don’t care who you are, when you are cycling and there is a head wind or a an uphill you are motivated to try a little bit harder to maintain speed. That push helps to get you a bit closer to burning 250 calories in 17 minutes. And just to keep things fun, for every uphill we have also installed a downhill and we even throw in a free tailwind every now and then to keep things fun.

Fun and adaptive for your (lack of) fitness level: This is the major thing I think most people miss out on, if it is fun you are more likely to do it more often and if your exercise of choice can “dial it down” a notch or two when you had a bit much is important, as time moving is the most important factor for health and the “intensity level” will get there when it gets there (and it will improve as long as you stick with it.) I will also note that I think having more then three gears is important to take advantage of what I am talking about as well as having the seat at the proper height (please see a bike shop to make sure, as most seats are too low which makes bicycling a lot harder then what it should be. And all you end up doing is hurting your knees rather then getting any sort of strength training.) When you are doing bicycling right you have the option of making it easier then walking. That is the power of the bicycle, as it can be easier then walking, harder then running and everything in between. You are in control of what you want to get out of it and the bicycle can grow with you as your fitness improves while never really losing the fun factor as the more you improve the more of the world you will want to see by bicycle.

Lose the ego

I have seen some people try cycling just to get thoroughly disgusted on how hard/slow it is to go up hill. Lose the ego, seriously. Any time cycling gets too rough down shift and go slower, no one is forcing you to speed up the hill. If you see a kid passing you on a tricycle just smile and say “Isn’t that cute.” and just do a pace that you can maintain. You need to trust that over time that will improve but only if you stick with it. If you make it harder then what it needs to be in the beginning you are not going to stick with it.

It helps to have this image

Your muscles are a lot like balloons, they need to be pre-stretched in order to blow them up easily. This pre-stretching happens automatically in the beginning (hills and wind, just to mention a couple of short random events that help this “stretching”) but as you find yourself plateauing you’ll need to add random pushes and challenges to make room for growth of muscles and to get a more calorie burn per minute.
Continue reading “Health officials once again downplay the benefit of exercise and bicycling”

Study: Only 4 Scenic Routes Left In Country

from the Onion
WASHINGTON—The Department of Transportation released the findings of a new study Thursday indicating that in the entire continental United States, only four scenic routes suitable for nice, meandering drives and aesthetically pleasing roadside views still exist. "A recent expansion of Cracker Barrel restaurants cost us three scenic routes last year, with two others falling to people chucking used diapers out their car windows," said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, pointing to a map depicting the four stretches of road that remain unblemished by development. "If you want to get away from it all and clear your head with a drive through the countryside, you’d better do it at these locations, preferably in next three months." In the course of the press conference, one remaining scenic route located in Wisconsin was rezoned to facilitate the construction of a methane-emissions plant.
Continue reading “Study: Only 4 Scenic Routes Left In Country”