from Issues with City Paper’s “Bike Issue”
from Bike Baltimore by Nate Evans
3. The “outcry” from cycling advocates was definitely not widespread. A few letters to editors, blog posts or emails to me does not constitute bike advocacy. “Complaining because you care” also does not constitute advocacy. Seeking an audience with decision makers to express concerns and offer assistance in creating a safer environment is advocacy.
But …
from Basics of Bicycle Advocacy
Build constituency—It is important to generate a network of individuals who share your goals. Politicians react to constituent interests. If you generate a network of people who lend support to your goals, you will be much more successful than acting as an individual, no matter how worthy your project may be.
And on letters to the editor, there is no doubt in my mind that Jeffery Marks and Michael Dresser have done more to educate motorists and create a safer cycling environment then anything the City has done to date. Education and outreach to those who need it most is bicycle advocacy!
It seems rather ironic that Nate seems to be critical of the very tools and mythology that established his job in the first place. But don’t get me wrong Nate is a wonderful guy and no doubt he was very instrumental in a favorable outcome as was the Mayor’s Bicycle Advisory Committee and Mary Pat Clarke. And maybe we could have sat on our hands and let them carry the ball… maybe… but what if the early statement “the investigation of the accident concluded that the cyclist was at fault because he rode into the car.” really stuck like it did for Alice Swanson in DC… But I don’t think that is the real issue Nate is trying to get at.
I’m going to stick my neck out a bit and read between the lines, Nate seems a bit over justifying police statements as misquotes or more to the point the police are finally starting to work with us and just in the nick of time I might add, just a month or two before Nathan’s crash. So we finally have something good going and it will probably not do us any good to dig up “old” issues. Fair enough but still Nate’s definition of what’s not bicycle advocacy needs work but I will agree what he does define as bicycle advocacy is very desirable.
I should also note that the City Paper was over critical on the City’s approach to establishing bike lanes. The way Baltimore is doing it is the most economical way to do it, seriously do people have a problem with that?
My only complaint is on one way streets have the bike lanes on the left side of the street. No stupid buses to play leap frog with, lower risk door zone, drivers know were the left side of their honk’n big SUV is a lot better then the right side.
Continue reading “Nate Evans:The “outcry” from cycling advocates was definitely not widespread. (About Nathan Krasnopoler’s crash)”