By Bob Mionske
…
It was only a few short weeks ago, as the year changed, that somebody, somewhere, fired off a gun to ring in the New Year. The bullet rocketed skyward, until the inexorable pull of gravity slowed its ascent, and it arced back to earth. A mile away, it slammed into an innocent New Year’s reveler, killing him instantly.
Police recovered the bullet, and based on tips, apprehended the shooter. Ballistics tests confirmed that the bullet came from the shooter’s gun. The only question now was whether the shooter should be charged with a noise complaint, or if he should be let go, perhaps with a warning to be more quiet in the future.
Improbable? Of course it is.
The “incident” described is fictitious, but that’s not what makes it improbable. No, what makes this depiction impossible to buy is that no law enforcement agency, and no District Attorney’s office, would treat this unintentional death as “just an accident” unworthy of serious charges; no chorus of apologists would assure us that the shooter’s regret is “punishment enough”; and if brought to trial, no jury of his peers would acquit him, thinking, “There but for the grace of God go I.”
And yet, when the instrument of injury and death is an automobile in the hands of a careless driver, that is often exactly what happens.
Each year more than 700 cyclists are killed by drivers on our nation’s roads while another 62,000 are injured. In the United States, the total annual death toll inflicted by drivers averages in excess of 40,000 people. It’s the equivalent of two jumbo jets crashing every single week, all year long, every single year, or entire towns being wiped off the face of the Earth. Salem, Massachusetts last year; Hoboken, New Jersey this year, and Twin Falls, Idaho next year. Every single year.
When 2,750 people lost their lives in the collapse of the World Trade Center, we went to war, invading two nations at a total cost to date approaching $1 trillion. When 2,750 people lose their lives on our nation’s highways every three weeks, month in, month out, every single year, we do nothing.
…
The basic problem we face is that in most states there are appropriate penalties for drivers who commit minor offenses like failure to yield, and there are appropriate penalties for drivers who commit the most egregious offenses, like killing somebody while driving drunk. But there’s no middle ground—no appropriate penalties for those who kill through carelessness, and no justice for those who were killed because somebody else shirked their duty to exercise due care.
…
As Andy Thornley notes, when drivers who injure or kill are not held accountable, we send all drivers the wrong signal about what is expected of them, and consequently, they have less incentive to be careful. By filling in the missing pieces of the vehicle code, we send the right signals to drivers about what is expected of them while operating potentially lethal machinery.
…
Continue reading “Traffic Injustice, Part II”
Why is the Netherlands safe for cycling?
– Strict liability entitles a crash victim to compensation unless the driver can prove the cyclist or pedestrian was at fault.
– Strict liability encourages more careful driving (and cycling, because a cyclist would be deemed to be at fault for crashing into a pedestrian).
Robert Hurst on Maryland’s Proposed Mandatory Helmet Law
Well OK it’s really Colorado’s bill but our bill is very similar. Some Highlights:
…
Did it work? Did bike helmets Save the Children? Well, kids don’t ride bikes nearly as much as they did in decades past, that’s for sure, so there are fewer children injured or killed in bike wrecks. Mission accomplished, according to some. It’s interesting how closely the sharp decline in kids’ bicycling matches the steep ramp up of childhood obesity (and X-Box thumb injuries). Did we trade some juvenile bike wrecks for lifelong heart disease, strokes and cancer? That’s messy, messy stuff, don’t think about it.
Interestingly, bike helmets have also provided easy answers for people not directly concerned with promoting safe bicycling.The helmet nannies, most of them, don’t even ride bikes themselves. Not at all. What they do is drive. And when they see someone riding a bike out there on the street, they think to themselves, man, that guy is a crazy person. I would never do that. And if they see someone riding a bike while not wearing a helmet — double take — that there is an affront to civilized society! That is a hostile act! Incredibly, unacceptably dangerous, and downright irresponsible. But this here, what I’m doing — swerving all over the freeway at 70 mph while trying to keep a hot mocha latte from slurping onto my pants suit — is not dangerous (on any one of many levels) or irresponsible, and of course would not require any sort of protective headgear. A mandatory bike helmet law serves these non-bike-riding citizens by confirming their modal biases, and, in turn, their basic lifestyle choices, for which they are always catching grief. In this way proposals for helmet laws pick up steam from outside the bicycle universe.
…
This version of the MHL is also interesting in that it would apply to 18-and-under rather than the typical 16-and-under. So here we would actually be discouraging bike commuting by young workers of driving age, in favor of putting them onto the highways in their Hondas with aftermarket exhaust, careening at 70 while ‘sexting’ and scarfing McMuffins, proven deadly dangerous to themselves and everyone on the road with them. Oh, and playing their rock-and-roll music. Dang kids.
Hey, it seems like an easy answer to me: One of the best ways — easiest ways — to improve this country, right now, on multiple levels, profoundly, would be to encourage transportational bicycling among 16-to-18 year-old would-be drivers. House Bill 10-1147 [our bill is House Bill 140] goes the opposite direction. One stated goal of the legislation is to reduce health care costs. History shows us that helmet laws do the opposite. Opposite, opposite, opposite. But figuring these things out would require facing some messy corners of the truth, and people just aren’t up to it. It’s much easier to be counterproductive while carrying the shiny box. Messy truths are bad politics.
…
Continue reading “Robert Hurst on Maryland’s Proposed Mandatory Helmet Law”
Smart Transportation and Bicycling Symposium
Yesterday we hitched a ride with John Brunow of bikes@vienna to attend the 13th Annual Smart Transportation and Bicycling Symposium in Annapolis. The symposium is sponsored by One Less Car: “Every day we advocate for providing safe and effective transportation alternatives for all citizens through education, lobbying, and facilitation between our communities, governments, and state and local representatives.”
Due to the heavy snow that fell during the previous night, the symposium got a late start and some speakers were not able to attend. Nevertheless, it was a good chance to network with other advocates and hear about the latest Maryland bike news. Here are some highlights from the day:
Several Maryland state legislators spoke in support of bike facilities: Senator Pugh (Baltimore Co), Delegates Cardin (Baltimore Co, Chair of the MD Legislative Bike Caucus), Carr (Montgomery Co), Bronrott (Montgomery Co). Secretary of Transportation Swaim-Staley spoke about funding for the Great Allegheny Passage trail.
Public Health and Transportation: Exploring the Inextricable Link – Dr. Keshia M. Pollack discussed the health impacts of our transportation choices including the linkage between obesity and driving, and the healthcare costs of obesity, auto crashes, and respiratory problems. A study conducted during the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta showed there was a 42% drop in asthma-related emergency visits when traffic was banned from the downtown area. She advocates for more “health people in healthy places”.
Transportation FOR Maryland, Jennifer Bevan-Dangel of 1000 friends of Maryland discussed this statewide coalition of approximately 30 groups trying to reform transportation planning in the state. “This means planning our transportation systems–and our development patterns–to ensure that there are convenient and affordable travel options available to everyone, in every community, at every stage of life.” A main focus is to expand traffic impact studies for large developments to include regional impacts on all modes of transportation.
Bicycling Advocates of Howard County (BAHC), Chairman Jack Guarneri talked about the great work being done by this coalition of bike groups in Howard County, which includes Columbia, MD. Their goals are similar to FABB’s and inlcude:
- Developing a Howard County Bicycling Master Plan
- Supporting physical road improvements (better shoulders turn lanes,etc.) and additional share the road signs
- Fostering driver and bicyclist education and communication initiatives
They helped establish the first Howard County bicycle advisory committee. They have 501(c)4 status, which allows them to be involved in political campaigns, but donations are not tax deductible.
Safe Routes to School in Maryland—Joe Pelaia, the Maryland Safe Routes to School (SRTS) coordinator noted that 270 schools and 112,000 students have been involved in SRTS programs in Maryland since 2007. WABA receives funds from the program for conducting bike ed classes. Patrick McMahon, the new Maryland Safe Routes to School National Partnership state network organizer, said a few words about his plans. He was hired by WABA in January. He also gets the award for longest job title.
Continue reading “Smart Transportation and Bicycling Symposium”
If riders don’t feel safe, they’ll leave bikes at home
In Vancouver, the Bermuda triangle for cyclists is the downtown peninsula.
In neighbourhoods such as Kitsilano or Commercial Drive, bike trips account for 10 per cent or more of travel.
But those numbers drop to about half of that as cyclists are asked to cross bridges and enter the downtown’s busy streets, where there is nothing more than painted lanes separating them from buses, cars and trucks.
"We have a good network downtown, but they’re narrow spaces.
"They’re daunting," said Geoff Meggs, the Vision councillor who sits on the city’s bicycle advisory committee. "We haven’t produced as much bike share as we’d like."
Vancouver engineers and cycling enthusiasts want to change all that by creating at least one route through the peninsula where cyclists are physically protected from vehicular traffic, arguing that they’re never going to attract the silent majority of potential cyclists if they don’t.
…
"Point Grey Road may be an excellent idea. But my concern is that we avoid spending money on disconnected pieces of a network. We want to start building fixes where we get the biggest bang for our dollars."
Continue reading “If riders don’t feel safe, they’ll leave bikes at home”
A Troubling Transportation Number for the Obama Administration
…
The second not-so-great transportation number, $53 million, reflects the total spending on pollution-reducing transit grants that the White House included in its budget proposal for fiscal year 2011.
The administration hopes to steer nearly 10 times that amount, or nearly $530 million, to its new three-agency partnership for sustainable communities. Still, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) pulled out the $53 million number today to note that the White House had proposed $22 million more for the same type of transit grants last year (and ended up spending $100 million).
From the EESI’s budget statement (emphasis theirs):
A focus on livability is expected to have benefits for air quality,
public health, energy savings, and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction. The
rest of the proposed budget, however, represents very little change in
how these issues and public goals are addressed. A special fund to help
reduce GHG emissions within FTA, in fact, saw a significant decrease from $75 million to $53 million.
Continue reading “A Troubling Transportation Number for the Obama Administration”
Hearing 2/10 Vehicle Laws – Reckless and Negligent Driving – Penalties for Death or Serious Bodily Injury
Who writes these laws anyway? No increased penalties for death or serious injury if; failed to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. nor is the classic "right hook" and the unsafe passing distance covered for cyclists. Drivers on a cell phones, that may not meet Maryland’s strict definition of negligent driving. Aggressive driving, excessive speed and unsafe passing are also exempt from this penalty. What a joke! Generally traffic violation penalties are fine if no damage done or minor property damage but penalties must be subject to being increased if death or severe injury is the result regardless of the specific traffic violation.
Human beings are not and should not be "just" road kill.
Anyway the hearing on SB 189 is 2/10 1 PM
Silver Spring wants to make city safer for pedestrians
…
"The problem isn’t that you guys aren’t doing a good job at specific places, but you are focusing too much on automobiles rather than bicycle and pedestrian connectivity," Casey Anderson, a member of the Silver Spring Citizens Advisory Board, said Jan. 27 when about 50 residents met with SHA and county Department of Transportation officials.
…
"Some of these are clearly preventable," said Darian Unger, chairman of the Silver Spring Citizens Advisory Board. "… And one of the things we keep coming back to is engineering and how things are designed around here."
…
Montgomery County has indeed focused too much on automobiles in the past, some county officials conceded. But these new projects, and the opportunity to improve communication and collaboration between the county DOT and SHA, should turn that around, they said.
"Montgomery County has been very car-centric in the past," said Emil Wolanin, the county’s chief traffic engineer. "But that’s changing. Whether you think that’s changing fast enough is a debate."
…
"We have to bring the ‘walkability’ back to the community," said Silver Spring resident Kathleen Samiy.
Continue reading “Silver Spring wants to make city safer for pedestrians”
We want your bike stories!
Come on, Baltimore cyclists…I know you have stories. You have stories about that diabolical crash you almost didn’t survive, that epic wheelie you popped, and about teaching your kid to ride his first two-wheeler. And now you can share these stories for the glory of seeing your name in print and the warm feeling of helping raise funds for Moveable Feast! Check it out:
Continue reading “We want your bike stories!”
FBM documentary at the Wind Up Space
by
I Love My Bicycle: The Story of FBM Bikes Trailer from BAD BREAKS on Vimeo.
I Love My Bicycle follows the history of FBM Bike Company. What began as some kids selling t-shirts out of a backpack has become one of the most well respected DIY bicycle companies in the World. Through fortune and misfortune follow FBM through their 15 years of mayhem as told by Steve Crandall and the rest of the BMX bicycle community.
Produced and directed by Joe Stakun.
Join Bike Night Baltimore and BmoreFixed as they host a FREE screening of the movie at The Windup Space on Wednesday, Feb 17th.
Doors at 6:30PM, movie starts promptly @ 7PM
Drink specials!
Door Prizes courtesy FBM!
