Summary of public (bike) comments and BRTB Response: Revised Plan It 2035 Goals & Strategies (October 2010)

4 Add a new strategy: “Do not compromise pedestrian
and bicycle safety for the convenience of motorized
vehicles.”

Response: The intent of this strategy is addressed by two existing
proposed strategies: (1) “Invest in cost-effective safety
improvements to eliminate hazardous or substandard
conditions in high crash locations and corridors (all modes)”
and (2) “Improve conditions to enable pedestrians and
bicyclists to interact more safely with users of other
transportation modes.”
[B’ Spokes response: State law basically says do no harm to existing bicycling conditions, that’s something that is not always done in the counties with road projects, so something is missing from the strategies.]

5 Add text to this strategy: “Improve conditions to enable
pedestrians and bicyclists to interact more safely with
users of other transportation modes. Provide specific
accommodation for bicycles and pedestrians on all
road improvement projects.”

Response: The Federal Highway Administration has a policy
recommending that all roadway projects routinely provide safe,
accessible accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists. The
exceptions are interstate highways or other roadways where
specific safety-related or topographic conditions preclude these
accommodations. All agencies and jurisdictions receiving
federal funding for transportation projects adhere to this policy.
In addition, the Maryland State Highway Administration has its
own policy addressing this issue.
[B’ Spokes response: Not all road projects are Federally funded so that bit lacks teeth. SHA’s policy is no funding for on-road bike accommodations unless part of a trail. So again we have not all that it could be.]

12 Add a strategy: “Create walkable environments.”

Response: This recommendation is consistent with several proposed
strategies. For example, under the Safety goal: “Improve
conditions to enable pedestrians and bicyclists to interact more
safely with users of other transportation modes.” Under
Accessibility: (1) “Increase transportation alternatives in all
modes for all segments of the population,” (2) “Provide strong
funding commitment for building both pedestrian and bicycle
facilities that establish linkages among activity centers and
provide access to public transit,” and (3) “Improve system
connectivity and continuity among all modes. . . .” Also, under
the Environment goal: “Enhance the quality of human health by
providing multimodal transportation infrastructure and services
that support active living and physical activity. . . .”
[B’ Spokes response: Strong funding commitment??? [Cough, cough.] OK SHA has been demonstrating throwing money at bike/ped issues (while our pedestrian fatality ranking keeps getting worse and worse) but what about those non-numbered roads that belong to the counties? Someone really should do a study to find out what the problems are… oh wait, someone did, and not just anyone but a team of researchers from the University of California, Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies and they show a lack of a funding commitment. Again we have not all that it could be.]

18 Add text to this strategy: “Sustain and balance capacity
in the highway, transit, and rail systems and pedestrian
and bicycle networks among urban, suburban, and
rural areas.

Response: This strategy is intended to provide a balanced system with
respect to capacity throughout the region to the greatest extent
possible. However, funding constraints and local preferences
may preclude providing choices in all modes in all geographic
areas.
[B’ Spokes response: Funding constraints that have left over $30M unspent in TE funds alone. Seriously? I wish I had those kind of financial constraints. We have a big problem here that the lower levels of Government are afraid to request changes and the upper levels are like “Nobody is complaining so it must be working.”

I lost interest in being involved at this level because all that was done was to white wash the status quo. I don’t know about you but I think the status quo is not very bike/ped friendly, yes there have been exceptions, especially in Baltimore City but is the Metro area bike/ped funding result driven? Are there more roads with a BLOS C or better? (Metric for being bike friendly.) Have pedestrian fatalities been going down? How’s that Federally mandated bike network coming along? Oh, little to no change since 2001. Seriously, how do we get out of this same old, same old?

Action Plan 2001 defines the vision, goals, and milestones for bicycling and walking in the Baltimore region. The regional plan outlines ten milestones for which the BMC and the BRTB Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Group were to ―prepare a yearly report card or status report tracking the achievement of these milestones and performance measures.These performance measures have neither been implemented nor tracked.


In addition to limited resources at the regional level, a lack of institutional support at the state level has hampered the Baltimore region‘s ability to use federal dollars on bike/ped projects. The region is unable to overcome restrictive state requirements, including the high local match required for Transportation Enhancements projects, (50% compared to Sacramento‘s 11.47%.), and modeling and air quality calculation tools that do not allow recognition of the benefits of non-motorized projects.


Planning documents in Baltimore express ambitious bicycle and pedestrian goals, but funding programs have not been adjusted to reflect this. As a result, funding tends to flow to traditional highway projects in Baltimore.

https://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=1304

On one hand, BRTB hands are tied by State Policy but still I would like to see some effort to achieve the state of the art or at least come close to what other States are doing. If you want to see a change write Terry Freeland, tfreeland@baltometro.org and at least have BRTB make a request to MBPAC to follow recomned funding policies for bike/ped projects. We need something better then what BRTB has done to date.]

Continue reading “Summary of public (bike) comments and BRTB Response: Revised Plan It 2035 Goals & Strategies (October 2010)”

Blogger slams columnist on speed cameras

from Getting There by Michael Dresser

One of Washington’s fiercest (and best) bloggers has ripped a Washington Post writer over a column that all but condoned arson when directed against speed cameras.

David Alpert of  Greater Greater Washington does a pithy job of taking apart the Post’s Petula Dvorak for her obsession with the sheer injustice of being caught breaking the law by one of those “horrid contraptions” in a column today. Instead, Alpert refocuses the debate where it belongs: the threat to human lives from speeding drivers.

By the way, I’m not sure a “speed tax” is such a bad idea. Speeders are by definition bad drivers and bad drivers impose more costs on the public than responsible ones. Why shouldn’t they pay an additional “tax.”


Continue reading “Blogger slams columnist on speed cameras”

Rules, laws, safety , motorists, cyclists and pedestrains

Two good articles by Richard Layman:
Safe bicycling and the right kind of infrastructure
"So this leads into the second problem with the laws being written to treat bicycles as co-equal traffic–the fact is that street infrastructure is optimized for motor vehicles, not bicyclists, and by its very nature, road design focused on motor vehicles tends to fail to provide adequately for bicyclists.
So bicyclists are expected to behave as motor vehicles, when both the laws and the infrastructure privileges motor vehicle traffic at the expense of the bicyclist."
https://urbanplacesandspaces.blogspot.com/2010/11/safe-bicycling-and-right-kind-of.html
Shared use paths (trails) and safety and marketing
"This is something that bugs me to no end about DC’s new Metropolitan Branch Trail. No rules are posted,…"
https://urbanplacesandspaces.blogspot.com/2010/11/shared-use-paths-trails-and-safety-and.html

Baltimore City Council Supports Bicyclists Bill of Rights and Complete Streets

From Bike Maryland (One Less Car)

 

Today, Baltimore City Council passed two important pieces of legislation for cyclists:  The Cyclist’s Bill of Rights Resolution and Street and Transportation Projects – Complete Streets Resolution.  These two resolutions mark a significant change in legal attitude toward cyclists and bicycle infrastructure.  Thanks to the support of Baltimore City government, positive steps were made in establishing the legitimacy of cycling as a mode of transportation.  Please take a moment to thank your representative in City Council for supporting our right to bike!!

Continue reading “Baltimore City Council Supports Bicyclists Bill of Rights and Complete Streets”

Alleged hit-and-run driver may not face felony

EAGLE, Colorado — A financial manager for wealthy clients will not face felony charges for a hit-and-run because it could jeopardize his job, prosecutors said Thursday.
Martin Joel Erzinger, 52, faces two misdemeanor traffic charges stemming from a July 3 incident when he allegedly hit bicyclist Dr. Steven Milo from behind then sped away, according to court documents.

Continue reading “Alleged hit-and-run driver may not face felony”

Finally, a Hipster Bicycle Video Game

from Phillyist by Mark Costello

Anyone who’s driven down Spruce or South Streets around 4:45 p.m. on a weekday afternoon knows that hipster bicyclists weaving their ironically out-of-date hipster ways through traffic are a serious headache. These fixie riders are enough to raise some blood pressure and ill-will, but some local programmer gurus are challenging our cynicism.

Presenting: Hipster City Cycle, a pixel art bicycling game whose various stages are set in different Philadelphia neighborhoods. For those who’re interested, this will be available for iPods and iPhones through Apple’s Apps Store relatively soon.

Popout

Continue reading “Finally, a Hipster Bicycle Video Game”

A MODEL FOR CYCLIST INVOLVEMENT

An excerpt from Steve Magas article "COMPARING SENTENCES – THEY DON’T ALWAYS ADD UP"
"The Gerike case presents a good model for cycling clubs wishing to become involved in a criminal case. We followed the case from Day 1, attended and reported on the hearings, communicated with the Prosecutor, spoke out in the media, and when the time was ripe for our involvement, we flooded the judge with our letters describing the impact of Gerike’s actions on the cycling community. The letters clearly had an impact as the judge read from many letters at the sentencing hearing."`
Continue reading “A MODEL FOR CYCLIST INVOLVEMENT”

Recommended changes to the Drivers’ Handbook

[B’ Spokes: Just to give you a heads up this is what your Bicycle Advocacy groups have been up to. If there are any updates, I’ll post them here.]


Statement of Purpose
The Maryland Driver’s Handbook should clarify how automobile drivers interact with bicycles. Goal 4 of Maryland’s Twenty Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Master Plan states. “Develop education and encouragement programs that will increase levels of bicycling and walking and foster a pro-bicycle and pro-pedestrian ethic in individuals, private sector organizations, and all levels of government.” We strongly urge adopting the following language to clarify how drivers of automobiles should safely anticipate and interact with bicyclists.

The general public, including drivers, bicyclists, and police officers, use the Maryland Drivers’ Handbook as the basis for learning how to use our roadways. However, experience over the past decades has shown the Handbook to be out of date. For example, bicyclists have been told to ride as far right as practical, but that has given motorists the mistaken impression that they can then easily pass a bicyclist within the same lane which has resulted in an astounding two-thirds of all bicyclist fatalities happening in non-intersection areas. We believe that we must bring the Drivers’ Handbook up to date to clarify everyone’s expectations, educate all parties, and foster a more positive cycling and driving experience. Simply put, we must get all rightful roadway users on the same page.

Guiding Principles

• Clarification of Maryland’s “dueling handbooks.” We consider Safe Bicycling in Maryland to be the de facto bicyclists’ roadway handbook. Thus, when MVA’s Drivers’ Handbook sets forth a rule for cyclists, there must be a reference explaining how to obtain a more complete set rules and guidelines. Also, both the Drivers’ Handbook and Safe Bicycling in Maryland must clarify and reconcile any conflicts between them.

• Clear Identification of Bicycling Rules. The Drivers’ Handbook is generally intended for new drivers, so to the extent that the Handbook sets forth general rules specifically for cyclists, we urge MVA to clearly and separately identify those rules.

• Continued Communication. We hope to see continued involvement with the bicycling community and we very much appreciate MVA’s first draft and the respect it shows to bicyclists.

Signed:

Carol Silldorff – Bike Maryland Shane Farthing – Washington Area Bicycle Association
Jon Morrison – Montgomery Bicycle Advocates    Jack Guarneri – Bicycling Advocates of Howard County
Barry Childress – Baltimore Spokes Baltimore Bicycling Club

Our Recommendations: (Note the following has also been approved by MBPAC)


Markings for Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Bicycles share most of Maryland’s streets with motor vehicles without specific traffic signs or pavement markings. Some streets, mostly in urban areas, do have shared-use lane markings (see photo). These markings alert motorists that bicyclists may be on the road, indicate to bicyclists where to ride, and discourage bicycling in the wrong direction.

image
(Photo for example only; permission needed to reproduce.)

Some streets have pavement markings that show lanes specifically designated for the exclusive use of bicycles. Solid or broken white lines separate these bike lanes from motor vehicle travel lanes. You may see bike lanes marked with bike lane signs or by a combination of bicycle symbols and arrows. Where parallel parking is allowed, similar lines may separate the bicycle lanes from the parking lanes.

Pedestrians also use roads in areas without specific signs or pavement markings. By Maryland law, any intersection with a sidewalk has a crosswalk–whether it is marked or not. Marked crosswalks generally have two parallel, white, solid lines that define where pedestrians should cross the street. Some marked crosswalks also have lines between (or instead of) the two parallel lines. But most crosswalks in Maryland do not have pavement markings at all. (See photo of unmarked crosswalk). Drivers must stop for pedestrians in crosswalks whether they are marked or unmarked.

Sharing the Road with Bicyclists

Right-of-Way
Bicyclists are authorized users of the roadway. Bicyclists have the same rights-of-way and the same duty to obey all traffic signals as motorists. Violating a bicyclist’s right-of-way can result in a fine of $500 and 3 points on your driving record. Bicyclists are your family, friends and neighbors, so please share the road with care and consideration. Motorists must drive carefully near bicyclists: even a slight mistake can result in serious injury or even death.

Expect Bicyclists on the Road
Expect to find a bicyclist on all types of roads (except interstate highways and toll facilities), at all intersections and roundabouts, in all types of weather, and at all times of the day and night. Bicyclists may ride out in the travel lane for their own safety due to narrow roads, or to avoid obstacles or pavement hazards. On roads without shoulders, or with cars parked along the right side, often the safest place for a bicyclist to ride is in the center of the lane. In Maryland, a bicyclist may use the full lane even while traveling substantially below the speed of traffic if the lane is too narrow for a car to safely pass a bicycle within the lane (i.e. narrower than 14-15 feet). Before opening a car door, check for bicyclists who may be approaching from behind. Do not drive on a shoulder (to the right of the white ‘fog’ line) even to pass another vehicle.

Following a Bicyclist
As you approach a bicyclist, slow down. Avoid honking your horn. Bicyclists can usually hear an approaching vehicle and loud noises can startle bicyclists, causing a crash. Bicycles do not have turn signals so bicyclists use hand and arm signals to alert you of their intentions.

Do not follow a bicycle too closely. Remember that small holes, glass, and other hazards can be particularly dangerous to bicyclists. Bicycles can stop and maneuver quickly so a bicyclist may swerve or change speed to avoid a road hazard that a motorist cannot see.

Pass with Care — Give Bikes at Least 3 Feet
Pass a bicyclist as you would any slowly moving vehicle. Be prepared to slow down, wait until oncoming traffic is clear and then allow at least 3 feet of clearance between your car and the bicyclist when passing. The same 3-foot clearance applies if you are passing a bicyclist in a bike lane, on the shoulder, or in the same lane as your car. After passing a bicyclist, check your mirror to ensure that you have completely passed the bicycle with enough room before you move back to the right.

Use Caution at Intersections, Bridges and Driveways
Always assume that bicyclists are traveling straight through an intersection unless they signal otherwise, and yield to bicycles just as you would to any other vehicle. Bicyclists often ride on sidewalks and trails along highways, so look both ways before crossing a sidewalk or trail when turning into a driveway. A bicycle may come from an unexpected direction.

Never make a right turn from a through lane immediately after passing a bike on a shoulder or bike lane. Doing so is as dangerous as turning right from the left lane after passing a car on your right, so stay behind the bicycle. Try to avoid any chance that a bicycle will be to your right or in your right blind spot when you turn right. Before starting a right turn, move as far to the right as practicable within the bike lane, shoulder, or right turn lane.

Yield to bicycles as to any other vehicle proceeding straight. Do not turn left immediately in front of a bicycle. Experienced bicyclists often ride very fast (as fast as 35 mph!) and may be closer than you think. If you are passing a left-turning vehicle by moving right, first look closely for bicycles. Wherever a travel way narrows for a bridge, parked cars, or other obstructions on the right, be prepared for a bicyclist riding on the shoulder to merge left into the main traffic lane.

Driving at Night
If you see a dim reflective object at night do not assume that it is outside of the roadway. It could be a bicycle in the main travel lane. Bicyclists sometimes avoid shoulders at night when cars are not present because tree branches, potholes, debris, and even the edge of the pavement are difficult to see. Your headlights may provide enough light for the bicyclist to safely move into the shoulder for you to pass, but it takes longer at night. When approaching a bicycle, use your low beam headlights.

Watch for Children
Children on bicycles are sometimes unpredictable. Expect the unexpected and remember they are small in stature and may be hard to see. Young bicyclists are especially likely to make surprising changes in direction. Be aware of bicyclists entering the roadway from driveways or near parked cars. Strictly observe speed limits in school zones and in residential areas to allow time to see, and safely share the road with, young bicyclists.
Continue reading “Recommended changes to the Drivers’ Handbook”