Online survey on health and transportation

Greetings,
 
As you may know, the American Public Health
Association has launched a new project aimed at investigating and strengthening
the links between the fields of public health and transportation, with special attention to equity issues.

 
We invite you to both complete
and also
share this survey broadly via your organization’s 
networks, newsletters, blogs, etc. to collect
your
 and
your
 
readers’ thoughts on the intersections
between public health and transportation – where they are, where they’re headed,
and where they should be. 

 
We’ve worked with Fenton Communications to provide you
with a
brief survey (11 questions) on the links between transportation and public
health. We will use responses to inform our recommendations on ways
the two fields can communicate and work together better.

 
The survey is posted online: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RDYFP2W
 
The survey is open until Friday 4/1 (despite
the date shown on the survey page)
. Thank you for your time and consideration.

 
Eloisa
 
Eloisa Raynault | American Public Health Association | 800 I
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 | Transportation,
Health and Equity Program Manager
| 202-777-2487 | https://www.apha.org/transportation
 
 

BRAC – More transportation problems

from Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space by Richard Layman

What I think is inexcusable is that the BRAC process fails to consider transportation impacts and fails to provide funding to mitigate the transportation impacts and needs it creates. Where’s the editorial about that?
First, the BRAC military base consolidation process specifically ignored transportation impacts of changes in the location of military installations.

Continue reading “BRAC – More transportation problems”

Only if the driver is drunk then maybe some serious consequences

Via Stop the Maryland Unsafe Driver:
Md. woman sentenced to more than 4 years in prison for involuntary manslaughter in car crash :: The Republic
According to trial evidence, more than two hours after the crash, a blood sample obtained by authorities indicated a blood alcohol level of .09 percent. Maryland’s blood alcohol limit is .08.
https://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StopTheMarylandUnsafeDriver/~3/xGcIdYcX3aI/

Fatal crashes up in Va., down in D.C., Md. | Ben Giles | Virginia | Washington Examiner

from Stop the Maryland Unsafe Driver by Driver
Fatal crashes at intersections with traffic lights are up in Virginia but declined over the last five years in Maryland and the District, a new report shows, and experts credit the use of red-light cameras for the drop.
via Fatal crashes up in Va., down in D.C., Md. | Ben Giles | Virginia | Washington Examiner.
(You know of course what this implies Maryland? You’re not smart enough to drive safely You require mother government to force you into rational behavior.
We believe Marylanders might be smarter than this. What do you think?)
Continue reading “Fatal crashes up in Va., down in D.C., Md. | Ben Giles | Virginia | Washington Examiner”

The Bicycle is the Answer. What was the Question?

from Commute by Bike by Tom Bowden

One troublesome argument that seems to be gaining traction is along the lines of, “Why should cycling be a federal issue? Shouldn’t it be a state and local issue?”
Of course that is conservative code talk for, “We don’t want to fund it, because we will get more votes with bigger projects.”
My response would be, True, it should be a local issue, and when all of you ear-marking politicians stop paving every square inch of our local communities with federal highway subsidies, we’ll be happy to take responsibility at a local level. But for now, we just want to level the playing field a little. And after all, for every federal dollar you spend on properly designed cycling infrastructure (and I don’t mean multi-use paths to nowhere), you can ultimately de-fund $10 worth of auto infrastructure. De-fund is a good word to use with Republicans and conservatives.

At one point in a briefing session on Wednesday, the constant repetition of the “wear a helmet” mantra got a little too much for me. It was cited that in nine out of ten cases of cyclist fatalities due to head trauma, the cyclist was not wearing a helmet. I posed the question, “If that is a justification for all cyclists to wear helmets, than what about the 99.999% of motorist head trauma fatalities who were not wearing helmets? Shouldn’t we start a campaign to make them wear helmets too?” I continued “I’m not anti-helmet–I’ve crashed with a helmet and without a helmet–but helmets are not the only answer, or even the most important answer. As long as we keep on putting so much emphasis on helmets as the most important safety issue, we perpetuate the myth that cycling is inherently dangerous. Cycling is not inherently dangerous, cars are inherently dangerous to cyclists, pedestrians and motorists. But all this helmet focus does is place the responsibility for safety on cyclists, rather than on the root cause of the problem, which is unsafe driving.”
I probably didn’t put it quite that well – I was actually shaking a little, anticipating a backlash to my politically incorrect rant. But to my surprise, there was applause and even a few shouts and whistles–the good kind. It was my fifteen seconds of attention, if not actual fame.

Continue reading “The Bicycle is the Answer. What was the Question?”

To reduce enforcement errors, MPD wants traffic division

When it comes to police enforcement errors, DC and Baltimore have something in common. I’ll note this paragraph from Greater Greater Washington:
"Some of the commanders admitted that interactions with pedestrians can be more confrontational than with motorists. This, they said, often happens because pedestrians are more likely to challenge the officer than drivers."
IMHO This is more likely because the police get the laws wrong when dealing with traffic laws and non-motorized individuals.
Continue reading “To reduce enforcement errors, MPD wants traffic division”

Bikes should be allowed at Loch Raven reservoir

By Candy Thomson – Baltimore Sun
When it comes to allowing mountain bikers to ride the narrow trails around Loch Raven reservoir, Baltimore officials have waged a two-year campaign of sticking their fingers in their ears to avoid the voice of compromise.
Let’s be clear: Their concern for maintaining the watershed’s integrity is admirable given that the reservoir is part of a drinking water supply that serves 1.8 million customers. Loch Raven is not a park.
But these officials act as if they alone possess the wisdom to protect the watershed. In their stubbornness they refuse to acknowledge that time, and best trail-building practices, march on.
And if they are successful in bottling up bikers on a tiny portion of the watershed, what happens to access for anglers, deer hunters and hikers who also embrace open space so close to the city?
After all, if rubber tires are a menace, what of boots?
Ask them about access for other users and city officials refuse to say. Bad sign.
MORE, the Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts, has been lobbying for continued access — where appropriate — to the single-track trails. Members have put money and sweat equity (more than 800 hours last year alone) into proving they are good stewards.
The Department of Public Works, charged with maintaining Loch Raven reservoir, has rejected those requests, contending that single-track trails create erosion in the buffer zone that protects the water. Officials insist that the only sanctioned riding is on four unconnected fire roads.
In 1998, the cyclists and the city agreed on a plan to allow riding on 12 miles of fire roads and to have the cyclists assist in maintaining them and policing activities.
For years, the plan was largely unenforced because the city lacked the manpower. In the meantime a network of single track trails continued to grow in the woods. Naturally, anglers, hunters birders and hikers began using the narrow dirt paths as well.
But today, that plan works about as well as any other 1998 relic (As the owner of a 1997 Toyota, I say that with great respect and a certain amount of fear).
The mud hit the fan after the city revived its force of watershed rangers, who started confronting recreational users — especially bikers.
Prodded by biking groups, the City Council reacted in November 2009, passing a resolution to get both sides working on a revised mountain bike plan.
Less than a month later came the Great Unpleasantness, when the mayor who liked the idea of bike trails was convicted of gift card hanky panky and resigned weeks later to be replaced by a mayor who wasn’t as enamored.
The ensuing rearrangement of the City Hall guard saw the DPW head replaced by Alfred Foxx Jr., the city’s Transportation chief and a former Army Corps of Engineers colonel.
All that explains, in part, why a resolution approved in 2009 remains unfulfilled.
Now we come to the tough nut.
Yes, Loch Raven is first and foremost a reservoir and all other uses and activities take a backseat. And there’s nothing bad about public officials protecting a public resource — that’s what we pay them to do.
But trail construction has improved since the days of Lewis and Clark. Heck, techniques have improved in the last decade. Those advances have allowed paths to be built near sensitive places such as rivers and marshes, areas that drain into reservoir watersheds, with little threat of runoff.
Groups such as Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources, the Appalachian Trail Conservancy, American Trails and the International Mountain Bicycling Association have incorporated those practices into their trail-building projects with success and are willing to share their knowledge.
MORE and IMBA have offered to help raise $50,000 for a thorough assessment of the trails and to help close those that are a public nuisance. State Sen. Jim Brochin of Baltimore County is working to broker a deal with the help of Under Armour.
But at a City Hall meeting last Tuesday, DPW officials clutched their talking points about buffer zones, sediment runoff, and the 1998 plan like a woobie.
Riddle me this: if the integrity of Loch Raven is so sacrosanct, why is it OK to have three golf courses and a shooting range within the watershed? And why is the city allowing heavy trucks to chew up the fire roads and create chocolate-colored rivers during the muddiest time of the year?
During the Gulf War, Foxx commanded an engineering unit that built roads to move soldiers and equipment into Iraq. He also managed military public works projects in the Republic of Korea and Germany.
No doubt he is a leader who has seen and successfully adapted to change. It would be nice to see him do it again.
"We’ve been back and forth and around and around on this," exasperated city councilwoman Mary Pat Clarke told both sides. "It’s bikes, gang. Bikes and sediment. We should be able to work it out."
Indeed.
Continue reading “Bikes should be allowed at Loch Raven reservoir”