The death penalty for being in full compliance with the law

From the Baltimore Sun Bicyclist struck, killed by vehicle in Anne Arundel County

Police said Young was riding on the right lane of the highway, which did not have a shoulder and had little ambient lighting.

Young was wearing dark non-reflective clothing on his bike that had a makeshift headlight, which was on. The bike also had a red LED-flashing light on the back which police say did not appear to have been turned on, leaving one small reflective lens to make Young visible.

Police say the driver did not see Young in the lane in front of him.

Bicyclist visibility and possible driver error appeared to be significant factors in the accident, police said. Alcohol or speed were not suspected.

First our law:

§ 21-1207.(ii) On the rear, with a red reflector of a type approved by the Administration and visible from all distances from 600 feet to 100[0 ??] feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful upper beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle.

That “one small reflective lens” is our legal requirement and no more is needed to be legal. Are there issues with the national [and local] standards, you bet. And have we tried to change those standards? Again yes but the Consumer Product Safety Commission asserts that this“one small reflective lens” is the “best” standard.

So could a cyclists go to an automotive or hardware store and get a better reflector then one that comes standard on the bike, sure but would that be legal? Technically probably not so if AA Police assertion is valid cyclists are in a legal Catch 22 but more to the point why are we not asserting the Basic Rule for driving on the highway:


§ 21-801. Basic rule

(a) Reasonable and prudent speed required. — A person may not drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed that, with regard to the actual and potential dangers existing, is more than that which is reasonable and prudent under the conditions.

(b) Driver to control speed. — At all times, the driver of a vehicle on a highway shall control the speed of the vehicle as necessary to avoid colliding with any person or any vehicle or other conveyance that, in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care, is on or entering the highway.

Drivers CANNOT overrun their headlights, so not seeing the cyclist is a confession of guilt of not driving at a prudent speed for conditions. If the police have a problem with bicycles reflective standards then take it up with Consumer Product Safety Commission in the meantime that is what is legal and we are not at fault for not exceeding what the law requires.

If you are concerned contact:
Col. James E. Teare, Sr., Chief (410) 222-8500
8495 Veterans Highway, Millersville, MD 21108
e-mail: jteare@aacounty.org


Washcycles coverage:

A cyclist – 40 year old Matthew Young – riding on Veterans Highway in Severna Park on Friday night (7:30pm) was hit from behind and killed. “Investigators do not believe that either speed or alcohol were factors in the crash. They have cited “bicyclist visibility” as the apparent cause of the accident, and noted the fact that the accident occurred at a particularly dark location on Veterans Highway, as well as the fact that Young was wearing dark non-reflective clothing.” There’s a pretty wide shoulder there. Was the cyclist on it? More here: “Police said the bike he was riding had a makeshift headlight, but a flashing light on the back of the bike does not appear to have been on.” Can they tell after a bike has been hit from behind? Maybe they have witness testimony?

The Idaho stop law – should Maryland adopt?

B’ Spoke: It amazes me how much slack is afforded to motorists and when there is a crack down on “safety” it seems that it is just the cyclists and pedestrians that are targeted. Motorists going 10 mph above the speed limit is perfectly fine, motorists coming to a complete stop in the crosswalk way past the stop bar, well that’s OK too but cyclists who do not put their foot down when stopping now that’s dangerous and should be get the full vengeance of the law.

It is time to get back to the spirit of the law and stop trying to get cyclists to do things that only really only make sense for 350 hp 2 ton killing machines then ones driven by human power at human speeds.

Please participate in our poll and let us know what you think about Maryland adopting the Idaho stop law.


Except from The Washcycle

“After one summer of police stings on bikes running stop signs, and a lot of talk, we have reached a reasonable peace treaty on this issue.

Local law enforcement here in Jackson Hole will ticket a bike that blatantly rolls a stop at speed with no care. Quick $100 fine, and no sympathy from bike advocates like me.

Legally, bikes are required to stop at Stop signs in Wyoming. However – Jackson Police and Teton County Sheriff have publicly said they will not ticket a bicyclist that:

– slows cautiously as approaching a stop sign,
– rider carefully looks left and right, fully in control and able to stop,
– rider signals properly if making a turn,
– rider does not fully stop but continues after determining it is safe to do so.

Our Sheriff and police have determined this is equal to a STOP and they will not harass cyclists. We agree.”

After one summer of police stings on bikes running stop signs, and a lot of talk, w

How Delaware made statewide bike funding history with CMAQ

Again filed under "News you will not see in Maryland." Like DE used to be, Baltimore Metro has not spent a dime of CMAQ on bike projects. Maryland gets about $49 million of CMAQ a year or two years of CMAQ could pay for what we plan to spend over 6 years with no local match required.
Info on TE and CMAQ: https://www.bikeleague.org/resources/reports/pdfs/rescissions_analsyis_te+cmaq_8.13.10.pdf
Our 6 year CTP: https://www.mdot.maryland.gov/Planning/CTP/CTP_Documents/Draft_CTP/8_BikePed.pdf
Read and understand this, no one else here does: https://www.rwjf.org/files/research/20091112mccannexecutivesummary.pdf
************************************************************************************************************************************
from Bikeleague.org Blog by Darren

By tapping into Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) improvement funds for bicycling projects – the first time ever in Delaware – Bike Delaware and its allies have opened the door for the future funding of bicycling projects that give people options to substitute their cars trips with enjoyable, healthy, non-polluting, non-traffic-clogging bike trips.

Every year Delaware spends about $12 million in federal CMAQ dollars. “But in the 20 year history of the CMAQ program, not one dime has ever been used for bicycling, greenways or trails in Delaware,” wrote Bike Delaware Executive Director James Wilson, “Until now. We have broken a 20 year drought and also set an immensely hopeful precedent for the future.”

Continue reading “How Delaware made statewide bike funding history with CMAQ”

Streetcar tracks deleted from 11th Street Bridge (for now)

[B’ Spokes: Is it too easy to build car centric roads and harder to build anything else?]
********************************************************************************************
from Greater Greater Washington


Already, federal regulations impose greater burdens on transit projects. To get funding, transit projects have to meet complex cost-effectiveness criteria while highway projects do not. The FTA acts at times like it’s the Federal Make Transit More Difficult Administration. That’s not because they’re anti-transit, per se, but simply that they are regulating transit, FHWA is regulating roads, and FTA is the stricter parent.

Continue reading “Streetcar tracks deleted from 11th Street Bridge (for now)”