A crazy week behind us and more big days ahead

from Bikeleague.org Blog by Andy


So what happens now? Well, the bill was finally approved in Committee and is currently scheduled to be debated on the floor of the House during the week of February 13 – it is still a very partisan bill and trying to pass an amendment is going to be extremely tough, should we go that route.

Meanwhile, the Senate MAP-21 bill threatens to spring back into life next week – which means we have to switch gears and ensure a strong “local control” provision is included to enable agencies to access funds for bicycling and walking projects. Senator Ben Cardin is our champion here, and if things do start to move as we expect we will need your help again.

Continue reading “A crazy week behind us and more big days ahead”

Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail

from Streetsblog Capitol Hill by Ben Goldman

American Petroleum Institute CEO Jack Gerard believes that most Americans “know America will need more oil.

So, more drilling (oil companies make money) and lax regulations (trucking industry makes money) mean slightly lower shipping costs (mega-retailers make money). Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box — whose business models each depend on wider highways and sprawl — are the major beneficiaries of this bill.
Continue reading “Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail”

Five Ideas for Frederick Road in Catonsville

A group of community leaders met with State Highway Administration officials to discuss options.
By Penny Riordan, Patch


1. Adding more pedestrian crosswalks: SHA officials said the only funding for Main Street improvements are funding sources that make ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) improvements and improve pedestrian safety. An example of a more visible crosswalk is outside the Catonsville Library.

2. Expanded sidewalks for outdoor seating for restaurants: The idea has been proposed by local real estate agents Kirby Spencer and George Brookhart and was discussed at the meeting, but any expansion of sidewalks for outdoor seating would also involve partnerships with the county and local business leaders.

3. Improved signage reminding motorists of pedestrian and bicycle traffic: Some of these improvements will occur as part of the county’s long-term pedestrian and bicycle plan for the area.

Continue reading “Five Ideas for Frederick Road in Catonsville”

Baltimore City Hall’s culture of secrecy and privilege

[B’ Spokes: I’m going to pull a few quotes from Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space by Richard Layman quoting Baltimore Sun. I want you to think about these comments and the issue with us getting bike lanes nixed by the city in preference for cars with no facts ever presented, while we have numerous studies from around the country that shows that exact opposite should be expected then what we are told by the City.]
****************************************************************************************************************

The embarrassing and unfortunate financial failure of the Baltimore Grand Prix was caused by a pervasive culture of secrecy and privilege within City Hall and at Baltimore Racing Development.

Propagandists and politicians use an over-reliance on secrecy to shape popular opinion and suppress dissent. But the success or failure of the Grand Prix was not a matter of opinion; it was a matter of financial facts.

Continue reading “Baltimore City Hall’s culture of secrecy and privilege”

Best of Brew Comments: Cyclists rallying to save Mount Royal bike lane

[B’ Spokes: This is too good not to be posted here as well. I will also note it is a shame BDOT will not even do a temporary study to see objectively if bike lanes will work here or not. All we are getting is that the City is afraid of change and that is not of acceptable.]
********************************************************************
“The bottom line here is that at least some parts of DOT do not want to inconvenience cars for even a minute, no matter the costs in safety to cyclists and pedestrians. This is a completely backwards policy suited more to 1962 than 2012. I don’t know the numbers for sure – I’d certainly love to see them – but I would be shocked if the current average traffic volumes on Mount Royal were high enough that removing a lane of traffic in each direction would result in a complete traffic standstill.”
– Chris Merriam

“I’m far more concerned with the safety and quality of life that complete streets (and a dedicated bike lane) will bring residents, students, and cyclists on Mount Royal at all hours than I am with how quickly county residents can get to and from work at rush hour.”
– Jed Weeks

“Studies in New York, Seattle and other places clearly demonstrate that added bicycle infrastructure and increased bicycle traffic reduce crash rates and severity for ALL users, including pedestrians AND vehicle occupants. Pedestrians cannot legitimately be used as any kind of excuse for prioritizing motor vehicles over bicycles.”
– Bad Planner

“Here’s a good idea: Get rid of the median. It’s just wasted space. Scrunch the road together and there would be plenty of space for bikes and would reduce the excessive crosswalk lengths. Then get rid of all left-turns, which add conflicts and rob needed capacity. Anyone wanting to turn left should be on one of the one-way streets.”
– Gerald Neily

“The median is not wasted space. It prevents the street from being hideous. That’s not a waste.”
– Robert T.

“We need the big picture: The thousands of excess cars per day need to be moved out of the Mount Vernon corridor, and over to the Jones Falls corridor for which it is suited. Instead, the city puts a bikeway on The Fallsway, where the cars should be, with the full acquiescence of the bike community. The Mount Vernon neighborhood has been fighting and losing this battle with the city for decades. The city needs a plan which puts neighborhoods first.”
– Gerald Neily

“You’re still dead wrong on the Fallsway, Gerald Neily. If it were well suited to do that job the giant viaduct superhighway wouldn’t have been built on top of it. Motorists have been ignoring that option for decades, because they know it is slower than the other options available. The bicycling community acquiesces on the Fallsway separated bike lane because there is no reasonable question as to whether or not it is in there best interest. It clearly is. There is no other option available for a genuine and authentic transportation route for cyclists. Transforming Mt. Vernon into some sort of pedestrian paradise, which seems to be your chief concern, would not connect cyclists with their jobs downtown and their residential communities.”
– Dukiebiddle

“The problem is nicely shown by the photo – cyclists don’t take a proper position in the road. They want bike lanes because they don’t want to learn how to cycle effectively – or safely. Trust me, bike lanes aren’t going to make people like the guy in the photo any safer. Learn to ride properly and you don’t need a bike lane to be safe.”
– Ian Brett Cooper

“Asking cyclists to take the lane there, especially less experienced ones, is unrealistic. There is a hill there and it can take some cyclists a while to make it up that road, causing drivers to honk and get really aggressive. Easy to sit behind a computer and ask people to do something which is actually very intimidating because drivers get very aggressive very quickly when they feel inconvenienced.”
– Liam

“I would love to take Mr. Cooper–and our DOT officials–on a bike ride through Baltimore. Ride along with us as we get cursed at, cut off by trucks, stumble over broken pavement, narrowly avoid giant potholes, blow a tire on broken glass, and still get to our destination before cars traffic. Bike transit is super efficient, but way too dangerous and stressful with little support from our city planners.”
– Rose Reis

https://www.baltimorebrew.com/2012/02/05/best-of-brew-comments-14/

Cyclists rallying to save Mount Royal bike lane

By Fern Shen, Baltimore Brew

Did two college presidents try to kill a bike lane proposed for the stretch of Mount Royal Avenue that runs right through their campuses? And have angry Baltimore cyclists and students, with their emails, phone calls and petition campaign, saved the lane for now?

Answering “yes” to both questions might be going too far,…

https://www.baltimorebrew.com/2012/02/03/cyclists-rallying-to-save-mount-royal-bike-lane/
*********************************************************************************************************
[B’ Spokes: To the point; good government is about maximizing project benefits and project success. The best practice (as required by law??*) "stakeholders should or must be consulted due to ethical, legal or social obligations."**

Nothing in this article has any semblance of "good government" … it’s that simple. This is too much like what happened with Monroe St. bike lane***

While a resolution does not have the same power as law but I can’t help but wounder what would be the consequences if we can show that BDOT has a pattern of ignoring the city counsel resolution?

Is it really too much to ask that the City to take steps to maximizing project benefits and project success? ]
Continue reading “Cyclists rallying to save Mount Royal bike lane”

The environmental building blocks of urban happiness

from Switchboard, from NRDC › Kaid Benfield’s Blog by Kaid Benfield

The Gallup study examined a number of questions directly related to the built environment, including the convenience of public transportation, the ease of access to shops, the presence of parks and sports facilities, the ease of access to cultural and entertainment facilities, and the presence of libraries.  All were found to correlate significantly with happiness, with convenient public transportation and easy access to cultural and leisure facilities showing the strongest correlation. 

The statistical analysis also included questions related to urban environmental quality apart from cities’ built form, and produced additional significant correlations:

“The more respondents felt their city was beautiful (aesthetics), felt it was clean (aesthetics and safety), and felt safe walking at night (safety), the more likely they were to report being happy.  Sydney, Australia (by: Alex E Proimos, creative commons license)Similarly, the more they felt that publicly provided water was safe, and their city was a good place to rear and care for children, the more likely they were to be happy.”

Among these, the perception of living in a beautiful city had the strongest correlation with happiness.  Curiously, though, the researchers found that the perception of “clean streets, sidewalks, and public spaces” actually had a somewhat negative association with happiness.  Happy people apparently find their urban environments both beautiful and messy.  (Well, the survey did include New York.)


Continue reading “The environmental building blocks of urban happiness”

O’Malley’s sales tax on gas is the right way to fund transport

from Greater Greater Washington by Ben Ross (See original for hyper links for background poofs https://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=13563 )
In his Wednesday state-of-the-state speech, Governor Martin O’Malley proposed ending the exemption of gasoline from Maryland’s 6% sales tax. This is the best way for the state to get more money for transportation.
Ending the sales tax exemption, rather than increasing the gas tax beyond the current 23½¢ per gallon, accomplishes two things. First, sales tax revenue keeps pace with inflation. With the current structure of the gas tax, politically difficult tax increases are needed just to keep transit operations and road maintenance constant.
Second, we now have an opportunity to refute a widely believed myth about transportation funding. Once upon a time, drivers paid for roads through the gas tax. Most people think that’s still true, but it’s not.
Maryland’s gas tax goes into the state’s Transportation Trust Fund, along with the sales tax on car sales, fares paid on MARC trains and MTA buses, and revenues from BWI Marshall Airport and the Port of Baltimore. When the gas tax was last raised in 1992, the 23½¢ state tax was 33% of the pretax price of gasoline. The sales tax on other pur­chases was 5%. The heavy tax on gas could be described as a user fee paid by drivers.
Today, though, the state gas tax is a little more than 7% of the price of gasoline. When drivers buy gas, they pay 7% into the transportation trust fund and get 6% back from the state’s general fund through the exemption of gasoline from the sales tax.
Ending the exemption would convert the gas tax back into a true user fee. Drivers would then pay a share of the cost of maintaining roads, just as transit riders pay a share of the cost of transit operations through their fares.
Many myths surround the subject of transportation funding, in Maryland as in other states. Transit advocates need to be vigilant as the legislature debates this issue to make sure that new funding builds transit lines and walkable grid streets rather than repeating the mistakes of the past. The better the public understands the realities of the state budget, the easier this will be.
Continue reading “O’Malley’s sales tax on gas is the right way to fund transport”

If you live in Maryland’s 1st District (Eastern Shore)

While Cummings (D-MD) and Edwards (D-MD) both voted in favor of the pro-bike Petri amendment, Harris (R-MD) voted against it.
https://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2012/02/strong-fight-from-rep-petri-others-but-pro-bike-amendment-defeated-by-two-votes/

Additionally on environmental/First Amendment issues, we have Chairman Andy Harris:
‘Gasland’ Journalists Arrested At Hearing By Order Of House Republicans (UPDATES)
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/house-republicans-order-j_n_1246971.html?ref=green&ir=Green

If you live in Andy Harris’ district you may want to try to get him involved in cycling events and/or write him a letter.
1st district map: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd?state=MD&district=1
Andy Harris’ issues: https://harris.house.gov/issues
Background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_P._Harris

email: https://harris.house.gov/contact-me/email-me