Cities can thrive again by making their downtowns more pedestrian friendly
By MONICA WILLIAMS, US News
…
Why do we need more walkable cities in America?
There are three fundamental reasons. About 15 years ago three distinct groups—the economists, the epidemiologists, and the environmentalists—started saying the same thing, each for their own reasons. The economists have shown us that people are more efficient in cities and more productive. The epidemiological argument has to do mostly with the obesity epidemic. Recent studies have shown that we’ve been focused for too long on diet and not enough on activity. That’s what a walkable city gives us. Finally, there’s the environmental angle: a fundamental rethinking of the way that Americans have always thought about environmentalism and this idea that countryside is good, cities are bad.
…
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/12/13/how-american-cities-can-thrive-again
Get outdoors and get moving with Baltimore-area outfitters that rent bikes, canoes, paddleboards and more.
Nice list of places that rent bikes and or other things in the general Baltimore metro area.
Can Statins Cut the Benefits of Exercise?
By GRETCHEN REYNOLDS, New York Times
An important new study suggests that statins, the cholesterol-lowering medications that are the most prescribed drugs in the world, may block some of the fitness benefits of exercise, one of the surest ways to improve health.
No one is saying that people with high cholesterol or a family history of heart disease should avoid statins, which studies show can be lifesaving. But the discovery could create something of dilemma for doctors and patients, since the people who should benefit the most from exercise — those who are sedentary, overweight, at risk of heart disease or middle-aged — are also the people most likely to be put on statins, possibly undoing some of the good of their workouts.
…
https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/can-statins-curb-the-benefits-of-exercise/
If your hand is on door handle, eye should be on cyclists’ path
By Tony Lovell
YOUR ARTICLE on Boston’s bicycle safety report notes that 22 percent “of the collisions between cars and cyclists occurred when a vehicle door opened unexpectedly on a cyclist” (“With crash data, city tries to make bicycling safer,” Page A1, May 15).
Car doors do not open “unexpectedly”; they open when people in the vehicle work a handle and push them open.
…
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2013/05/21/your-hand-door-handle-eye-should-cyclists-path/fZXgkb6kHkW3BoOHHGcLJN/story.html
Helmets – Expectation and Inconsistency
[B’ Spokes: i found this interesting.]
*******************************************
From As Easy As Riding A Bike
…
Drivers, we are told, have seatbelts, and a protective shell around them, and there is no need for them to protect their ‘fragile skulls’ in the same way that a bicycle user might with a polystyrene shell. This despite the evidence that the most common severe or fatal injury to car occupants is to the head.
Similarly, a UK study of data from 33 hospitals between 1996 and 2003 found that around 25% of car occupants who had suffered a head injury did not survive [pdf].
Plainly the heads of car occupants are susceptible to serious damage. Yet lobbying for car occupants to wear helmets is non-existent, even if, to use the emotive language of bicycle helmet advocacy, ‘they might just save one life’. Or that ‘wearing a helmet is surely better than not wearing one’.
…
https://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2012/11/26/helmets-expectation-and-inconsistency/
You’re not as visible on a bike at night as you think, new study shows
by Michael Andersen, Bikeportland
People who ride bikes at night consistently overestimate their visibility to other road users, a new study has found.
They also overlook a few tricks, like reflective strips around the ankles and knees, that can help the most.
…
https://bikeportland.org/2013/05/20/youre-not-as-visible-on-a-bike-at-night-as-you-think-new-study-shows-87044
Inner Harbor may soon be open to bicyclists
By Jack Lambert, Digital Producer-Baltimore Business Journal
Baltimore’s Inner Harbor, which is technically off limits to bicyclists, could soon open up for city riders.
The city’s Department of Transportation is requesting $43,627 to study implementing bike paths along the city’s waterfront promenade, an almost seven-mile stretch that runs from the Museum of Industry in Federal Hill to Canton Waterfront Park.
…
How to win the mandatory helmet law debate. :p
Woman Brags About Hitting Cyclist, Discovers Police Also Use Twitter
If you haven’t seen this already: https://jalopnik.com/woman-brags-about-hitting-cyclist-discovers-police-als-509059331
UPDATE: Way now says she isn’t anti-cyclist because she’s "a cyclist herself." She’s also been suspended from her job and her personal life has taken a nose dive.
It’s a classic problem of “sunk costs”
If you’ve already purchased a car, there are big financial incentives to drive it. Image: Better Institutions
Today’s tangent comes from Streets Blog’s “The Big Leap From Car-Lite to Car-Free”
I was thinking wouldn’t be great if we could model car use after mass transit use, there in front of your house is a free car and to use it you just have to plop down $25 for the first 20 miles (average daily cost and average daily travel distance rounded to nice numbers). Just think how many more would use a car more often with that model.
Wait, what? You think car use would go down if we charged per trip? Well that’s my point, why are we using this model to “sell” mass transit? When I moved to New York City they offered a discount if you bought tokens in bulk. And with a pocket full of tokens I was more likely to pick mass transit as my travel mode, that is to say I had already sunk my money into mass transit so I used it.
But here in Maryland it is very different, a single trip is $1.60 a day pass is $3.50, 30 cents more for what a ideal round trip should cost but our routes are so convoluted that a day pass is considered a bargain because you are going to have to take more than one line to get anywhere. – That is not selling mass transit as a viable option!
And then there is the weekly pass, ideally if you took mass transit to and from work 5 days a week or ten trips that would cost $16 so for 50 cents MORE you can get a weekly pass. Again only a bargain because of our poorly designed routes. – That is not selling mass transit as a viable option!
For completeness there is a monthly pass that is exactly the same price of 20 round trips. I really have to ask what is the incentive here for someone with a car to try mass transit? If you happen to live/work someplace where one line will serve your needs there is no incentive to sink costs into mass transit, and if you live/work someplace where you need to take more than one line so these options are a bargain but the wait and transfers are a nightmare so that is not an incentive.
While we do need to un-spaghettize our routes we really need to offer a discount at least on the monthly pass to help put mass transit on the same playing field as owning a car.


