Pedestrian helmets

BY RANDOLPH HALUZA-DELAY, BLAKE POLAND AND BYRON MILLER, EDMONTON JOURNAL

In fact, the data show that pedestrians are more at risk than cyclists -based on injuries per distance travelled -but no one is proposing pedestrians wear helmets. Risks of cycling can be overstated. Injury statistics are already low for cycling. It is widely believed by European policymakers that mandatory helmet laws and even high-profile promotion of helmet use send the unintended signal that cycling is unsafe, which can deter people from riding. The St. Albert study and an Alberta-wide study published by the same researchers in another journal appear to show a reduction in adult ridership after helmet legislation took effect.

Other research shows that mandatory helmet legislation does reduce bicycle ridership, which is counterproductive.

Continue reading “Pedestrian helmets”

City clarifies stance on Fells Point lights

Apparently per the linked article in the Sun, the City can make intersections pedestrian hostile without a study but need a study to restore even what was there prior to the improvement for motor vehicles. Jamie Kendrick seems to imply accommodating motoring traffic at 4 AM is the bigger priority then accommodating all users safely during peek travel times. This seems to go against State law:

§ 2-602. Public policy.

The General Assembly finds that it is in the public interest for the State to include enhanced transportation facilities for pedestrians and bicycle riders as an essential component of the State’s transportation system, and declares that it is the policy of the State that:

(1) Access to and use of transportation facilities by pedestrians and bicycle riders shall be considered and best engineering practices regarding the needs of bicycle riders and pedestrians shall be employed in all phases of transportation planning, including highway design, construction, reconstruction, and repair as well as expansion and improvement of other transportation facilities…

The following stats should make it clear that Maryland/City traffic engineers have been clueless for a long time and I’ll call BS in a lot of what they are saying.
image

image

Pedestrians involved in traffic crashes, Baltimore City represents 32% !!!

County 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 AVG. %
Baltimore City 934 972 973 874 832 917 31.9

2009 Bike/ped fatalities by county

County Person Type

Total Killed
Driver Passenger Motorcyclists Pedestrian Pedalcyclist Other/Unknown
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

BALTIMORE CITY (510)

10

26.3

6

15.8

4

10.5

16

42.1

2

5.3

0

0

38

6.9

Total

269

49.2

83

15.2

69

12.6

113

20.7

11

2

2

0.4

547

100

That’s right more pedestrians then drivers were killed and 42% of Baltimore traffic fatalities are pedestrians, yet we need a “study” to see if safety improvements are warranted for pedestrians, after all we have 4 AM motoring traffic to consider.
Continue reading “City clarifies stance on Fells Point lights”

Trail (shared use path) courtesy tips

from Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space by Richard Layman

For Norm File2473

This is from Victoria BC from John Luton’s Flickr stream. It bugs me to no end that there aren’t “rules/etiquette” signs posted on DC’s Metropolitan Branch Trail. Uniformly I have found that bicyclists ride to the right. But pedestrians are all over the trail, either walking in the direction of traffic or against it.

But since etiquette signs aren’t posted, why should we be surprised?

(Otherwise, I love the trail–other than the lack of adequate signage generally.)


[B’ Spokes: And if there ever becomes a problem the first thing to go up is a 15mph speed limit for cyclists, when keeping all traffic to the right would make a lot more more sense.]
Continue reading “Trail (shared use path) courtesy tips”

Keep Left

by Jeffrey Marks

The picture shows the bike lane on the right-hand side of St. Paul Street abruptly ending at Mount Royal Avenue, where traffic exiting the JFX merges onto Saint Paul (“Where the Bike Lanes End,” Feature, April 20). But perhaps the better choice would be to place the bike lane on the LEFT SIDE of St. Paul. That way the cyclist could avoid this hazardous traffic merge. Other advantages of a LEFT SIDE bike lane would be not having to deal with buses that are constantly pulling to the curb to drop off and pick up passengers. And drivers exit parked cars onto the sidewalk instead of the bike lane.

At the April 18 Bicycle Meeting at Johns Hopkins University, City Bicycle Planner Nate Evans indicated that he is leaning toward placing the bike lane on the left side of Maryland Avenue once the street is repaved. Why the left instead of the right? To avoid the hazard at Lafayette, where cyclist John Yates was killed by a right-turning tanker truck. Also to avoid conflicts at Franklin Street, where right turns are authorized from both the right-hand and right-center lanes. I look forward to the city carefully evaluating, when designing bike lanes, which side of a one-way street works best for bicyclists. Maryland law provides an exception, when operating on a one-way street, to our state’s general rule for cyclists to keep right. And other cities, like New York City, often have bike lanes on the left-hand side of a one-way street.

Lastly, a bike lane is no substitute for paying attention and evaluating whether to use the bike lane or roadway. Bike lanes work best when the road follows a stream, railroad track, freeway, etc., where right-hand turns aren’t authorized. Bike lanes are new to Baltimore, and motorists haven’t been instructed to slow down and merge into the bike lane behind the cyclist when preparing to make a right-hand turn. Consequently, bicyclists need to be alert. When a motor vehicle pulls beside you but doesn’t complete the pass or passes and slows down, WATCH OUT. The motorist may be preparing to make a right turn. The safest thing is for you to slow down, and when safe pull directly behind the motor vehicle, preparing to stop if the vehicle slows down further or turns right. And there are downhill bike lanes, where right-hand turns are authorized, that I leave the bike lane and use the regular traffic lanes. The University Parkway downhill bike lane north of 39th Street, where cyclist Nathan Krasnopoler was critically injured by a car turning right into Broadview Apartments driveway, is the tragic but classic example of why the bike lane isn’t always the safest place to ride.

Jeffrey Marks

Baltimore
Continue reading “Keep Left”

2011 Study of ALL Ohio Fatal Bike Crashes

By: Steve Magas


The problem with the ODPS reports that I am looking is that you have to accept the officer’s street level, on-the-spot conclusion as to “fault” without argument or analysis. The only way to independently determine if the officer was “right” in blaming one side or the other is to get the actual report and review it with an accident reconstructionist’s eye. In MANY crash reports, there is simply not enough information written down by the officer to permit this even if you had the time and inclination to do so!

Montgomery County [Ohio] had 83 car/bike crashes listed in the report – 14 to a page and almost six full pages worth. As I started reviewing each line of data I noticed that the vast majority of the crashes on each page were blamed on the CYCLIST. At the end, it appeared that police in Montgomery County blamed the cyclists in 59 of the 83 crashes – a whopping 71%. Motorists were only blamed for causing 18% of the crashes [15 of 83] while 9 were said to be “undetermined.”

71% vs. 18% – that’s a HUGE difference from the almost 50/50 split I saw in Franklin County. Are Dayton cyclists that much worse at obeying the law, and that much better at causing crashes, than their brethren in Columbus? Didn’t make sense.

Continue reading “2011 Study of ALL Ohio Fatal Bike Crashes”