Category: Bike Paths

[B’ Spokes: Everyone loves off-road trails right? Well let’s look at the best and worst of off-road facilities:

Maryland’s over stress on off-road encourages the worst of off-road facilities (bottom half) over and above more appropriate on-road facilities. And even with the best of paths (top half) most MD paths do not allow for comfortable biking from home to the trail (Per NHTSA survey 89% of bike trips begin at a residence and only 7% at a recreational site), nor do paths generally allow comfortable biking from the trail to work or grocery stories, such an idea is not even in the works. We need a more workable solution then what’s being offered and more verity in the offering of bike facilities at not only the state level but the local level as well.

Public participation is the key to remedying this and the following letter was put forth on one of the advocacy lists, I encourage everyone to write their own letter in support of greater public participation. ]

---

IC wrote this letter to MdTrailsSummit@dnr.state.md.us

Hi,

I was just informed of the Maryland Trails Summit. Since moving to
Maryland last December, and as I’m a keen cyclist who enjoys riding on
multi-use trails, I’ve been eager to get involved in related issues,
so something like this, which relates directly to cycling, seems like
it would be something I’d like to get involved with. Unfortunately the
Maryland Trails Summit seems to have been specifically designed to
exclude people like me (i.e. a keen cyclist who has a limited budget,
a job and a family) from the event.

Even if concerned people can afford the $50 admission fee (which seems
especially steep in these harsh economic times), the event is
scheduled for a Tuesday during school and working hours. I wonder,
could it have been scheduled for a LESS convenient time? Maybe holding
it on Thanksgiving Day would have kept more people away, but that’s
debatable. How is Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources hoping to
get useful feedback on its programs from concerned citizens when
virtually the only people able to attend are likely to be well-off
seniors or wealthy business tycoons with time on their hands?

Then there’s the venue. Does it really need to take place next to one
of the busiest airports in the country? If anyone wanted to cycle to
the event, they would have to negotiate the numerous freeways that
surround the venue. I mean, this is a summit devoted to trails. Sure,
many people besides cyclists are interested in Maryland Trails, but
surely most of these people live in Maryland and don’t need to fly
into BWI! As a cyclist, I would find it a scary prospect indeed to
negotiate such a labyrinth of freeways and highways to get to the
event on my bike, even if I lived within twenty miles of it.

Then there’s the environmental cost of this event. It seems to me that
the Department of Natural Resources should be discouraging the use of
fossil fuels and encouraging more sustainable modes of transportation,
yet the Department of Natural Resources seems to be going out of its
way to get people to fly or drive to the Maryland Trails Summit.
Honestly, with this lack of concern for the environment, what hope do
Maryland residents have that the Department of Natural Resources is
truly focused on safeguarding the state’s natural resources.

It seems to me that this event is structured to appeal more to the
travel industry than to the people the Department of Natural Resources
are supposed to serve – i.e. the residents of Maryland. I’m eager to
get involved when issues related to our natural resources come up, but
with a limited budget and a kid in school, there’s no way I can do
this.

Please, when planning events like this in the future, have some
thought for the people Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources is
supposed to serve! As for this event, I sincerely doubt anything
useful can come from it, as it effectively prevents constructive input
from the people who are most likely to use Maryland’s network of
trails.

 

Greetings Trail Enthusiast! 

 

REGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN!

The Maryland Trails Summit :

Sharing the Vision-Making the Connections

October 19, 2010

 

The Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is proud
to announce that the Maryland Trail Summit will be held on Tuesday, October
19th at the Holiday
Inn BWI
Airport in Linthicum
Heights , Maryland .
The Summit will bring together trail users from all over the State to discuss
the future of trails in Maryland, preview an interactive map and website, work
on regional projects, network with other trail users and planners, learn about
trails in neighboring states and much more!

 

This opportunity is not to be missed. This 1-day event is
the culmination of ideas and input from the four Regional Roundtables that DNR
hosted this past summer. If you are a commuter, boater, bicyclist,
rollerblader, hiker, walker, skier, jogger, pet lover, paddler, camper, birder,
off-road vehicle rider, equestrian, or anyone else that has an interest in
trails in Maryland
this is the event for you!

 

Maryland’s very first trail summit is just around the
bend, so complete your online registration and come prepared to learn and
discuss the future of trails in Maryland. We hope to see you there!  https://www.dnr.state.md.us/land/Trails/FirstTrailsSummit.asp

Limited Space – Register online today to assure your
seat!

 

 

 

The Md Trails Summit
Team

MdTrailsSummit@dnr.state.md.us

https://www.dnr.state.md.us/land/Trails/index.asp 

 

By Larry Walsh – Pittsburgh Gazette
My first experience with roll-on/roll-off train service occurred in the late 1990s on the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad which runs from Cumberland to Frostburg, a 16-mile trip.
I had pedaled a steel Bianchi mountain bike on alternate sides of the railroad tracks from Frostburg to Cumberland. It was a bumpy ride, thanks to all the ballast. What is now a smooth ride on a crushed limestone surface trail was years away.
When I arrived in Cumberland, I had breakfast at the All Aboard Café in the renovated red brick railway station, rode around Cumberland for a few hours and caught the 11:30 train back to Frostburg.
After buying my ticket, I rolled the bike over to the baggage car and lifted it up from the platform to John Jeppi, the conductor. I used bungee cords to secure it to the interior of the car. When we got to Frostburg, Jeppi rolled it over to the door and handed it down. No muss, no fuss.
The Allegheny Trail Alliance and the Trail Town Program have asked Amtrak officials to approve roll-on/roll-off service along the railroad’s Capitol route from Pittsburgh to Washington, D.C. And they would like all members of the bicycling community to help make that request a reality.
Roll-on/roll-off service allows cyclists to transport their bikes on and off the train without turning the handlebars sideways, taking the pedals off and putting them in boxes.
The alliance also has asked Amtrak to include roll-on/roll-off service to trail towns it does not currently service.
To accomplish those goals, they are asking cyclists to write letters to Joseph H. Boardman, president and chief executive officer of Amtrak, National Railroad Passenger Corp., 60 Massachusetts Ave., NE, Washington, D.C., 20002. The railroad prefers hard copies rather than e-mails.
They also ask that copies of those letters be sent to Ray LaHood, secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, Washington, D.C., 20590; and to the alliance at PO Box 501, Latrobe, Pa., 15650 or admin@atatrail.org.
Time is of the essence.
If enough cyclists write enough letters as soon as possible — and now would be a good time to do so — roll-on/roll-off service along the Capitol Limited could be in place by next spring.
It might be possible, for example, to ride the train from Pittsburgh to Connellsville, bike 90 miles to Cumberland, Md., along the Great Allegheny Passage and catch the train back to Pittsburgh. The Capitol Limited stops in those towns.
Rockwood, about halfway between Connellsville and Cumberland, has asked Amtrak to approve a stop in their bike-friendly southern Somerset County town. If approved, the stop would serve bicyclists in the spring, summer and fall and snow sports enthusiasts during the winter.
Hidden Valley and Seven Springs, which maintain miles of mountain-bike trails, are only 15 miles away. And each resort has expressed interest in providing roundtrip shuttle-bus service to Rockwood if it becomes an Amtrak stop.
Depending on snow conditions, cross-country skiers and snowshoers arriving by Amtrak could stay overnight in Rockwood and ski or shoe on the passage. If there is not enough snow, they could go to the resorts and/or nearby state parks such as Laurel Ridge and Kooser.
If you would like some suggestions about what to include in your letter, go to https://www.GAPtrail.org.
For more information about the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad, go to https://www.wmsr.com or call 1-800-872-4650.
Although there was no bike fee on my first roll-on/roll-off trip, the railroad now charges $5. Advance reservations are encouraged. The railroad now transports up to 60 bikes a day.
You might want to include that information in your letters.
Continue reading “Cycling: Help needed to spur bicycle service on trains”

Exploring Baltimore’s Byways, Trails and Parks Through Public Transit
About Naturally Maryland, Naturally MTA
This blog tracks the progress of a long term project designed by Christopher Johnson, an environmental manager and consultant.
Throughout the summer and autumn of 2010, Mr. Johnson will be exploring the benefits of Baltimore’s many recreational opportunities. He will do this, however, by throwing his hiking boots and/or fold-up bicycle on board his city’s public transit system.
This blog will report on Mr. Johnson’s public transit adventures. It will designed to be eventually published into a handy local outdoor recreation guide that will attain three major goals:
1) Help low income, especially inner city, citizens, with no access to a car, reach inspiring natural areas that will benefit their physical and mental health.
2) Help environmentally conscious hikers and bikers reach their favorite local destinations without the guilt of polluting their beloved natural areas via the consumption of polluting, unsustainable fossil fuels.
3) Advocate the benefits the Maryland Transit Administration’s (MTA’s) system contributes to our community.
Continue reading “Naturally Maryland, Naturally MTA”

Dear Trail Supporter:

The Allegheny Trail Alliance and the Trail Town Program have been advocating for the roll-on/roll off service along Amtrak’s Capitol Limited Route and need your continued help! Thanks to your support we are that much closer to seeing this happen, and you can still contribute! The attached letter thanks Amtrak for their interest and encourages them to provide this service as soon as they can. Please adapt the letter below and make the necessary changes (highlighted as red text) to personalize it for your own situation and interest.

Amtrak prefers hard copies rather than e-mails, so we ask that you send a copy directly to the address listed in the supplemental letter below.  Also, please mail a copy of your letter to the ATA at P.O. Box 501, Latrobe, PA 15650, or e-mail it to admin@atatrail.org  Your immediate help is necessary and greatly appreciated!  

Thank you for your time!

 

SUPPORT LETTER:

 

Date

 

Mr. Joseph H. Boardman

President and CEO of Amtrak

National Railroad Passenger Corporation

60 Massachusetts Avenue, NE

Washington, DC  20002

 

Dear Mr. Boardman,

 

Thank you for your interest in providing enhanced bicycle service on the Capitol Limited.  I am excited by the prospect of being able to roll-on and roll-off on the Capitol Limited route between Pittsburgh, PA and Washington, DC.  I am encouraged with the news that it might be available in Spring 2011.  I want to bike the Great Allegheny Passage and the C&O Canal towpath and appreciate the opportunity to ride the rails before I ride the trails.  I look forward to using the service every year/month/week, especially between x and y. 

 

We appreciate Amtrak’s commitment to enhancing tourism opportunities and multi-modal transportation networks. 

 

Sincerely,

(Your signature)

 

Copy:  Ray LaHood, Secretary, U. S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Continue reading “Amtrak Call to Action”

[B’ Spokes: to contrast Maryland; 16 projects for the next *six* years at a cost of $20 million (at an average of 5 projects and $3 million a year.) Also note that Maryland requires a 50% local match "to make the money go farther" like that’s working real well. And as noted previously we have enough Transportation Enhancement money in the bank to do all 16 projects *this year* with NO local match.]
******************************************************
The Kansas Department of Transportation has chosen 18 projects for its transportation enhancement program through fiscal year 2012, at a cost of $14.8 million.
KDOT received 55 applications from local governments. For the 18 selected projects, a minimum of 20% of their cost must come from the applicant.
…
Continue reading “KDOT Transportation Enhancement Program”

by washcycle

Continue reading “Still Fighting the "Trails Bring Crime" Myth”

by washcycle

A Nevada non-profit can quickly remove railroad ties and tracks, dispose of them and replace it with a crushed stone surface. For free.

While most rail-to-trail projects can
linger in the costly planning and design process for a decade, Godsey
has placed Methuen’s on the fast track by accepting an offer she could
not refuse — having the railroad tracks and ties removed, disposed of,
and replaced with a crushed-stone surface for free by Iron Horse
Preservation Society, a Reno, Nev., nonprofit.

“They basically come in, take out the rail stock and in essence, they give you a rail trail,’’ Godsey said.

The 18-employee organization makes its money from the sale of the
railroad material, and makes sure that none of it ends up in a landfill

Because the organization does the work at no cost, Hattrup argues, a
bidding process is not necessary. It also eliminates the cost for the
community of removing creosote-treated railroad ties, which are
considered a hazardous material, he said.

Continue reading “Fast, Free Trails”

by washcycle
After I wrote about the Fox News story on the "Crackdown on the CCT," Joe contacted the Maryland-National Capital Park Police who characterized the story as a "misrepresentation".
They noted that the Lt. interviewed in the story did not mention this as a “speed crackdown” and did not mention the use of radar or lidar speed measuring devices. She was reinforcing the increased visibility of their officers in an effort to address the myriad of unsafe behaviors exhibited by many of the trail users, whether walkers, joggers, dog walkers or bicyclist. She also talked about the educational efforts underway from members of their sworn compliment, rangers and volunteers.
Park Police has contacted Fox regarding their misrepresentation and they are going to work with them to do another, more comprehensive piece that accurately depicts what is occurring on the trail. Fox has taken the story down from their site and so have I.
Park Police reiterated that speed was not found to be a factor in the two most recent collisions, the first was rider error on the part of the passing bicyclist and the last was jogger error combined with rider error ("…if the cyclist had given a warning before he tried to pass left, the lady might’ve heard him early enough to wait before she made her u-turn and if the lady had of glanced over her shoulder before she made her u-turn she might’ve seen the cyclist passing on her left."). While speed could have played a part in the first situation, the investigating officers did not find evidence or witnesses that could clearly verify a high speed on the part of either cyclist.
The Park Police is trying to take a broad approach to these issues and not focusing solely on cyclists. They note that even their sign board shows more about awareness and courteous behavior than speed.
This all sounds good, and certainly there are steps we can all take to make the trails safer (including going slower as appropriate).
Continue reading “Fox retracts Crackdown on the CCT Story”

UPDATE: Fox retracts Crackdown on the CCT Story https://www.baltimorespokes.org/article.php?story=20100804105937326
***************************************************************************
If you ride this trail I recommend reading the whole article by Washcycle, which I will highlight one bit:
"He also names the worst thing as dogs walked on long extended leashes or off-leash. But yes, by all means, crack down on an rule that is hard to comply with [cyclists going over the speed limit], is not cited as a particular problem by an officer on the trail and was not a factor in the recent crashes that instigated the crackdown. Then let’s burn down the observatory so that this never happens again."
Continue reading “Crackdown on the CCT”