SPEEDING AND AGGRESSIVE DRIVING – GHSA

[B’ Spokes: One of the things I want to point out is while Maryland does have a law against aggressive driving, it is one of the worst, hard to enforce laws I have seen as it totally ignores driving behavior that puts pedestrians at risk. For example; not yielding to pedestrians in a crosswalk – not part of our aggressive driving law. A copy of the relevant laws are at the end.

And let’s not forget Maryland’s seeming tolerance for going 10mph over the speed limit for way too many drivers.]


SUMMARY OF KEY SURVEY RESULTS AND GHSA RECOMMENDATIONS

Despite reductions in the overall number of speed-related crashes and fatalities, the proportion of speed-related fatalities that occur on U.S. roadways has remained unchanged over the last quarter century. Almost one-third of all fatalities continue to be speed-related.

GHSA recognizes the major role speed and aggressive driving play as contributors to traffic death and injury. To better understand state efforts to control speed and aggressive driving problems, GHSA conducted an online survey of states in late 2010 and early 2011. All fifty states and Guam responded to the survey.

A summary of the key results of the survey follows.
a. Public perception of speed. Recent research on traffic safety culture and the survey responses cited by state highway safety representatives make it clear that the public’s perception of the speed and aggressive driving problems are inconsistent at best and apathetic at worst. Few advocates exist for speed reduction; speeding is a behavior that many people engage in routinely. Even so, the majority of states conduct both enhanced speed enforcement programs and public awareness campaigns focused on speed; many also address aggressive driving. Opportunities exist for all states to strategically focus enforcement and awareness efforts on both speed and aggressive driving.

b. Conflicted role of technology. Speed enforcement tools such as radar and laser speed detection devices are common technology applications in almost every state; their purchase is supported by most state highway safety offices. Yet a large majority of these states’ laws allow motorists to use technology to avoid speeding tickets. Far fewer states have adopted automated technology such as red light running and automated speed enforcement cameras despite the successful use and acceptance of these devices in many other parts of the world.

c. Other factors. Over-involvement in speeding crashes is likely to involve the same type of driver—young, male and a resident of a rural area—as is involved in many other dangerous driving behaviors. States are challenged in trying to change the behavior of this risk-taking personality type, who often combines speed with other aggressive driving behaviors, further increasing the risk of crashing. At the same time, representatives of state highway safety offices report a reduction in law enforcement officers that are available to conduct speed enforcement activities.

d. Appetite for change. A national agenda for change was adopted by highway safety leaders at the National Forum on Speeding in 2005. Yet very few significant aggressive driving and speed-related laws and policies have been enacted in states since that agenda was created nearly seven years ago. Many of the state speed-related laws that have passed in the last seven years include raising speed limits and are not expected to improve safety.

GHSA Recommendations
The leadership of GHSA believes that many opportunities currently exist to address the tremendous loss associated with speed-related crashes, deaths and injuries. These strategies can be successfully implemented in states across the country in collaboration with and supported by federal partners. To that end, GHSA makes the following recommendations:

■ States should explore addressing speed concerns through aggressive driving enforcement since the driving public believes that aggressive driving is a serious threat to their safety.

The public’s attitude about speeding is enormously conflicted.

The action agenda included seven steps designed to:

■ Raise the priority of speed as a traffic safety issue

■ Set and achieve speed reduction goals, focusing on the reduction of extreme speeders and/or all travel speeds in high risk areas like school or work zones

■ Improve speed-related data and research, investigating improvements in: travel speed and crash data, methods to get accurate speed data in crashes, educating the public on speed issues, methods to use “smart” vehicles and highway technology to manage speed

■ Implement engineering strategies designed to reduce speed, both in the short term (like speed humps or roundabouts, transitional signing, pavement markings, and signal timing) and in the longer term (like roadway design, speed limits consistent with design and use, and variable speed limits)

■ Implement speed enforcement strategies such as raising the priority of speed enforcement with law enforcement agencies, the general public and the courts, and utilizing automated speed enforcement

■ Implement education strategies

image

In the AAA Foundation’s Traffic Safety Culture
Index poll, nearly 90 percent of drivers view aggressive driving as a very
serious or somewhat serious threat to their own safety.

and a 50 percent
reduction in the incidence of speeding more than 6 miles per hour over
the speed limit. Officials credit these programs with reductions in fatalities on the order of 15-20 percent on the targeted road systems.
[Note: That Maryland is basically unconcerned till 12 mph over the limit.]

The report concludes that if the results of the most rigorous U.S. speed
management efforts (not using automated enforcement) could be
replicated and sustained throughout the all 50 states and proportionate
benefits were realized, 1,000 to 2,000 lives could be saved per year.



Continue reading “SPEEDING AND AGGRESSIVE DRIVING – GHSA”

ASSESSMENT OF DRIVER YIELD RATES PRE- AND POST-RRFB INSTALLATION, BEND, OREGON

16. Abstract
The Oregon Department of Transportation improved two crosswalks on US 97 (Bend Parkway) near Bend, Oregon by installing Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), replacing signs, and enhancing pavement markings. At the location of the intersections where the RRFBs were installed the highway is a four-lane facility with a center median, bike lanes, and sidewalks. The posted speed is 45 miles per hour. At about the same time that the improvements were made at the two crosswalks on the Bend Parkway, RRFBs were installed at another nearby location in the City of Bend. As the use of RRFBs is considered experimental, particularly at locations with posted speeds in excess of 35 mph , an evaluation of driver compliance rates and conflicts at the three intersections was undertaken.
Driver yielding rates increased significantly at all three intersections where RRFBs were installed. Prior to the installation of RRFBs, data was collected on a total of 159 crossings at the three intersections; following RRFB installation data was collected on a total of 211 crossings. The average yielding rate was 17.8%; following installation the average yielding rate more than tripled to 79.9%.
The conclusion of the study was that RRFBs should be considered for installation on high-speed facilities where there are posted speeds greater than 35 miles per hour if there are pedestrians and bicyclists using the facility and a history of crashes or the potential for them. The design of an RRFB installation needs to include features to improve the visibility of the crossing.
https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP_RES/docs/Reports/2011/SPR721_bend_rrfb.pdf?ga=t

Muskegon Police begin bike patrols

[B’ Spokes: I still think it would be a good idea to have more police bike patrols in Baltimore.]
******************************************************************************************************
By Bob Brenzing
MUSKEGON, Mich. (WZZM) – Neighborhood police officers in Muskegon are patrolling earlier than ever this year on bicycles due in part to the warm weather.
Members of the Neighborhood Response Team have been using their specially outfitted mountain bikes for the last two weeks. The officers say the bikes help break down barriers between them and citizens that a cruiser with lights and sirens can cause.
The bikes are also quieter, which can be helpful when responding to a call.
So far, March has brought with it what members describe as perfect biking conditions.
Officers often bike between 20 and 30 miles in a shift, working primarily in downtown and neighborhoods close to downtown.
Jon Mills
Continue reading “Muskegon Police begin bike patrols”

Why Bicyclists Are Better Customers Than Drivers for Local Business

by Tanya Snyder, Streets Blog
Do local and state officials tune out when you try to talk to them about bicycling? Are they unconvinced by arguments about public health, transportation options, or clean air? Do business leaders send you packing when you suggest building new bike lanes and bike parking, fearing that the loss of car parking will keep customers away?
Then show them the money.

That closeness has a dollars-and-cents value. Cyclists travel at what Portland Bike Coordinator Roger Geller calls a “human-scale speed” that allows them to “stop and buy something.” Besides, Economides said, if you’re car-free you’ve got an extra $6,000 jangling around in your pocket that you otherwise would have spent on gas and car maintenance (actually, $8,776 if you believe AAA). According to researchers with Intelligent Communities, a program of the National Building Museum, only 16 percent of household car expenses stay within the local economy.

Continue reading “Why Bicyclists Are Better Customers Than Drivers for Local Business”

DON’T BUY NATIONWIDE AUTO INSURANCE

[B’ Spokes: Just to highlight one section of Steve Magas’ article:]
***********************************************************************
By Steve Magas

Another point on auto insurance and “Med Pay” – BEWARE OF NATIONWIDE INSURANCE. I usually don’t mention specific companies by name here – but Nationwide bears special mention because of its position on “Med Pay” claims that is VERY detrimental to all cyclists.
In every other “bike case” I’ve ever handled with ANY other insurer, the Med Pay clause covers bicycle riders. Nationwide, however, says “NO” to cyclists. Nationwide claims that its Med Pay coverage is limited to “pedestrians” and that cyclists are not pedestrians. Therefore, Nationwide refuses to pay the medical bills of bicycle riders who are whacked by cars. No word on whether Nationwide would cover, skateboarders, rollerbladers, horseback riders, pogo stick users, kids on tricycles, babies in baby carriages or other “non-pedestrians.”
I am currently litigating this with Nationwide, so I may have more to report down the road. There is a court of appeals decision in Ohio which indicates that, for insurance coverage purposes, the word “pedestrian” means more than simply people walking around. For purposes of Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist coverage, the words “pedestrian” includes a person on a bicycle, according to a 2004 case. Nationwide, apparently doesn’t feel this case is controlling…

Bottom Line 2 – Cyclists should NOT be buying Nationwide Insurance.
Bottom Line 3 – TALK to your insurance agent about your H/O, Auto & Umbrella needs!
The full article: https://www.ohiobikelawyer.com/bike-law-101/2012/03/magas-makes-the-wall-street-journal/

A little Mazda with a brazen mission to travel the speed limit

[B’ Spokes: This story takes place in Staten Island but could just as well be anywhere in Maryland. Some quotes:]
***************************************************************************************************************************

Minivans, SUVs, small sedans, pickup trucks, cars with crosses dangling from their rear view mirrors and school bumper stickers proudly displayed on the back, even a rickety United States Postal Service truck whizzed past at speeds more appropriate to the Expressway than a street lined by businesses and pedestrian sidewalks.

It was witching hour in the borough. As the little Mazda continued on with its brazen mission to travel the speed limit, it was on the receiving end of lots of outsize anger and nastiness — behavior that has given the borough its reputation as a home to reckless, thoughtless drivers.
"There are conditions that contribute to the behavior; there are triggers like things that impede progress, traffic obstructions, detours, bad road conditions, traffic," said Jeffrey Deffenbacher, a psychologist at Colorado State University, who conducted studies of road rage and obnoxious driving. "There are huge differences in people. Most people may be frustrated but don’t react with illegal behavior like running lights, or assaultive behavior. But if the environment leads to other people being rude and inconsiderate and cutting people off, that becomes a cue…it stirs the pot."

People are going nowhere fast.

https://www.silive.com/news/index.ssf/2012/03/staten_island_drivers_going_no.html

Missing police reports

B’ Spokes: In this news report from Hawaii details some of the issues of not having police reports. The cool thing is the KNOW they are missing police reports and heads will roll, in contrast with Baltimore and Maryland where it is policy NOT to make a police report unless certain criteria are met. Bike thefts? Not a problem because not many reports are filed. Bike got stolen, no report will be filed because…
And that’s just one of many issues that Baltimore cyclists are up against.
Ref: https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/category/6743/video?clipId=6879832&topVideoCatNo=91610