By Joe Cortright, City Observatory
\nAt City Observatory, we try to stick to a wonky, data-driven approach to all things urban. But numbers don\u2019t mean much without a framework to explain them, and so today we want to quickly talk about one of those rhetorical frameworks: specifically, how we talk about driving.
\nOur wonky perspective tells us that there are lots of problems that stem from the way we use cars: We price roads wrong, so people over use them. Cars are a major source of air pollution, including the carbon emissions that are causing climate change. Car crashes kill tens of thousands of Americans every year, injure many more, and cost us billions in medical costs and property damage. And building our cities to accommodate cars leads to sprawl that pushes us further apart from one another.
\nBut the problem is not that cars (or the people who drive them) are evil, but that we use them too much, and in dangerous ways. And that\u2019s because we\u2019ve put in place incentives and infrastructure that encourage, or even require, us to do so. When we subsidize roads, socialize the costs of pollution, crashes and parking, and even legally require that our communities be built in ways that make it impossible to live without a car, we send people strong signals to buy and own cars and to drive\u2014a lot. As a result, we drive too much, and frequently at unsafe speeds given the urban environment.
\n…<\/p>\n
Don’t demonize driving\u2014just stop subsidizing it<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n