B’ Spokes: On one hand it’s nice to see them doing something but on the other hand it’s just lipstick on a pig, the substance of the problem remains. Bigger stop signs, come on, that’s not going to do a thing. The issue is basically that if you accommodate a behavior, you get that behavior. In this case a right turn to an acceleration lane is the problem.
\nTo explain further, people stop if there is cross traffic, no cross traffic little to no compliance for coming to a full and complete stop, too much like the wide radius right turns they put everywhere so people turning right don’t have to stop, heck they don’t even have to slow down.
\nThe cheap fix would be to put a raised crosswalk in to make sure turning trucks slowed down significantly before turning (I believe the cost to be around $500). A better option would be to get rid of the acceleration lane and put a stop light in (I believe the cost to be around $2000.)
\nSo there you have it, to prevent another cyclists death is not worth $2000. So sad that either of these options are not considered viable solutions.
\nWBAL’s coverage: https:\/\/www.wbaltv.com\/news\/improvements-coming-to-intersection-where-bicyclist-died\/35801248<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
B’ Spokes: On one hand it’s nice to see them doing something but on the other hand it’s just lipstick on a pig, the substance of the problem remains. Bigger stop signs, come on, that’s not going to do a thing. The issue is basically that if you accommodate a behavior, you get that behavior. … <\/p>\n