by Jonathan Maus<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Researchers analyzed existing practices and oversaw focus groups in five communities; Boulder\/Denver, Colorado; Chicago, Illinois; Ithaca, New York; Portland, Oregon; and Santa Clara County, California. <\/p>\n
Specifically, they broke down bike\/transit integration approaches to four methods: <\/p>\n
\n(1) “Bike on transit” (transporting the owner’s bicycle aboard \u2013 inside or outside \u2013 the transit vehicle),
\n(2) “Bike to transit” (using and parking the owner’s bicycle at a transit access location),
\n(3) “Shared bike” (sharing a bicycle, which would be based at either the transit access or egress point),
\nand (4) “Two bikes” (using an owner’s two bicycles at the access and egress location). <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nIn terms of cost-effectiveness, the study found that “bikes TO transit” ranked best overall while the favored method of focus group respondents was “bikes ON transit”.*<\/p>\n
The preference to bring bikes along for the transit trip has to do primarily with concerns about security. “Minor adjustments in terms of security could address the current challenge of “Bike ON transit” capacity limitations,” wrote researchers, “and make the less cost effective strategies comparable to “Bike ON transit.””<\/p>\n
Learn more about this issue and download the full report here<\/a>.<\/p>\n