from Bikeleague.org Blog by Darren
\n…<\/p>\n
Greg Cohen, the president of the American Highway Users Alliance, starts out by saying, \u201cWe can all agree on the need to combat distracted driving.\u201d Great. But then he went on to say, \u201cYet if we are honest, we should admit that we all get distracted sometimes. Hopefully an educated group of \u201ctransportation experts\u201d on this blog has put down the cellphone and blackberry while driving. But the reality is that we will continue to make mistakes \u2014 enforced legislation and education can only go so far to stop them. So we need to do more than try to stop all distractions \u2014 we need to embrace the many engineering solutions that focus on preventing crashes, injurires, and fatalities caused by the distractions that, under any realistic scenario, will continue to occur.\u201d That\u2019s what got Andy going.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s Andy\u2019s full response:<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n Let me start by taking the unusual step of agreeing with Greg Cohen \u2013 don\u2019t worry, normal service will resume later. Reducing or eliminating distracted driving is indeed something we can all agree is critical to continue the decline in traffic fatalities recently reported for 2009. Regardless of what we drive and where we drive, distracted driving is a real threat. Reducing that threat is something that we all have a stake in; cyclists and pedestrians can stand beside truck drivers and soccer moms in minivans to address it together, and who knows where that might take us in the future as we actually get to know each other a little better. That started to happen at the \u201cTowards Zero Deaths\u201d meeting in Washington last month. At the state and local level, you will find cycling organizations to be great allies with an impassioned membership ready to work with you to pass tough distracted driving legislation and support the enforcement that must go with it. That started to happen in Florida, Michigan and many other states this year.<\/p>\n Where we part company with Greg is being willing to accept that some level of distracted driving is acceptable and inevitable \u2013 and that therefore we should focus on making vehicles and roadways that are OK to crash on. I\u2019m not interested in trying to walk or ride along the street as part of some giant fairground bumper car game where drivers feel like they can crash with relative impunity. I want drivers (and cyclists) to pay attention, drive carefully, and NOT crash. The focus for me has to be on improving driver behavior, attention and responsibility.<\/p>\n We have come a long way in improving the safety of vehicle occupants. Indeed, you could be fogiven for wondering why we aren\u2019t doing dramatically better already after the introduction of seat belts, air bags, anti-lock brakes, crumple zones, roll-over protection and the like. After 50 years of highway design that has widened, and straightened roads; removed all manner of roadside obstacles (like killer trees); installed collapsible poles and safer guardrailing; limited access and crossings; rumbled, signed and marked roads with ever-increasing levels of visibility and reflectivity. After quite incredible improvements in medical treatment and EMS services in the event of crashes. Really, where have all the benefits to all these great developments disappeared? Why have we still been killing 40,000-plus people a year for decade after decade?<\/p>\n One possible answer could be that we are a nation of generally lousy, distracted, careless drivers who really don\u2019t take the responsibility of driving seriously and are not held to account for that behavior individually or collectively. That needs to change, and focusing on distracted driving is a welcome opportunity to do just that.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n