The Dirty Dozen: Twelve Anti-Transit Myths <\/p>\n
Myth Number One: Light Rail has been a failure everywhere. The estimated costs always prove too low, and the ridership projections are always too high.
\nMyth Number Two: Transit is a declining industry.
\nMyth Number Three: Commuting by rail is slower than commuting by car or bus.
\nMyth Number Four: Transit does not relieve congestion.
\nMyth Number Five: Where transit is needed, buses are better than rail. Buses cost less and provide the same or better service.
\nMyth Number Six: Rail transit can only serve city centers, but most new jobs are in the suburbs.
\nMyth Number Seven: Rail Transit does not spur economic development.
\nMyth Number Eight: Transit brings crime into a community.
\nMyth Number Nine: Most Light Rail riders are former bus riders.
\nMyth Number Ten: Free market competition and privately operated transit is better.
\nMyth Number Eleven: On average, most of the seats on a bus or train are empty.
\nMyth Number Twelve: It would be cheaper to lease or buy a new car for every rider than to build a new light rail system. <\/p>\n
A Few More Myths The Dirty Dozen: Twelve Anti-Transit Myths Myth Number One: Light Rail has been a failure everywhere. The estimated costs always prove too low, and the ridership projections are always too high. Myth Number Two: Transit is a declining industry. Myth Number Three: Commuting by rail is slower than commuting by car or bus. Myth Number … <\/p>\n
\n1. Transit subsidies exceed automobile subsidies.
\n2. Increasing transit funding does not increase ridership.
\n3. Transit is not cost effective.
\n4. Most people do not want rail transit.
\n5. Monorail is better than Light Rail.
\n6. Light Rail is not safe.
\n7. Transit infrastructure is only constructed to get federal money.
\n8. Rail transit does not help revitalize downtowns.
\n9. Transit is an ‘inferior’ good; as incomes rise, demand declines.
\n10. Transit inefficiencies and failures are the result of politics.
\n11. Rail transit is a federal conspiracy.
\n12. Transit is not important because its market share is so small.
\n13. Transit systems are poor stewards of public funds.
\n14. Rail transit does not increase property values.
\n15. Before federal involvement, transit paid for itself.
\n16. Light Rail is promoted by overly low fares.
\n17. Cutting spending on transit would allow tax cuts.
\n18. Transit subsidies should be directed to users, not providers.
\n19. Light Rail is social engineering.
\n20. Transit costs more than it should.
\n21. Trains are noisy.
\n22. The overhead wires for Light Rail are ugly.
\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.smartgrowthamerica.org\/weyrich3.pdf<\/a>oldId.20100902153933990<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"