{"id":166613788,"date":"2010-04-13T09:36:28","date_gmt":"2010-04-13T09:36:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.baltimorespokes.org\/?p=166613788"},"modified":"2010-04-13T09:36:28","modified_gmt":"2010-04-13T09:36:28","slug":"md-sha-revised-guidelines-for-rumble-strips-comments-needed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.baltimorespokes.org\/?p=166613788","title":{"rendered":"MD SHA Revised Guidelines for Rumble Strips: Comments needed!"},"content":{"rendered":"

[Baltimore Spokes: This is just sad that I get to hear about this from Delaware cyclists. Way to go MDOT on involving MD key stakeholders, not!]<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n\"\"<\/a>Responding to Bike Delaware concerning cyclist-unfriendly rumble strips on Rt.273 – a <\/span><\/span><\/span>very popular bike route for northern Delaware and Cecil County cyclists – Maryland’s State Highway <\/span>Administration presented us this “<\/span>Revised Interim Draft<\/span><\/a>“<\/span> (pdf)<\/span>. If you are disappointed with <\/span>the current design, such as the spacing between the rumble strip and the white line, and how they <\/span>follow the breakdown lane striping to a pinch, or provide few if any openings for cyclists to exit, <\/span>PLEASE take a few moments to review this new policy.<\/span>
<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>Among other excerpts from the draft:<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n